Abstract

Hybrid program analysis approaches, that combine static and dynamic analysis, have resulted in powerful tools for automated software testing. However, they are still limited in practice, where the identification and removal of software errors remains a costly manual process. In this paper we argue for hybrid techniques that allow minimal but critical intervention from experts, to better guide software testing. We review several of our works that realize this vision.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call