Abstract

The project FUXYA2020 was intended to design and prototype a low-cost basic energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer for all those cases where there is not enough financial support to buy a commercial device. Indeed, home-made instruments are ideal when funds are low but constant over the years, as this approach allows the costs to be spread over a longer period of time. The FUXYA2020 was intended mostly for cultural heritage (CH) applications: we optimized the geometry to meet the requirements for both low Z matrix objects, such as glasses and ceramics, and medium-high Z materials, such as metals; besides, we designed a positioning system through Arduino components to obtain good results and repeatability for samples with a complex geometry. The FUXYA2020’s performance was tested both for qualitative and quantitative analyses, the former on pigment layers, and the latter on gold-based certified alloys, exploiting Axil-QXAS software for data elaboration. The classification of ancient ceramics based on multivariate analysis obtained through R environment was also carried out. The qualitative data on pigments have also been compared with the same data obtained by a commercial XRF spectrometer, demonstrating how our very simple and inexpensive prototype can be of great help for a rapid and reliable characterization of cultural heritage materials whenever commercial devices are unaffordable.

Highlights

  • Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) is a very suitable analysis method for the examination of cultural heritage materials and is widely used, thanks to its relative straightforwardness of use and its totally non-destructive character, allowing for analysis without any sample preparation

  • The classification of ancient ceramics based on multivariate analysis obtained through R environment was carried out

  • The qualitative data on pigments have been compared with the same data obtained by a commercial XRF spectrometer, demonstrating how our very simple and inexpensive prototype can be of great help for a rapid and reliable characterization of cultural heritage materials whenever commercial devices are unaffordable

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) is a very suitable analysis method for the examination of cultural heritage materials and is widely used, thanks to its relative straightforwardness of use and its totally non-destructive character, allowing for analysis without any sample preparation. In the FUXYA system, the two most expensive elements are obviously represented by the X-ray source and the detection unit These are mandatory for a reliable spectrometer, but with a homemade project it is possible to spread the purchasing on different periods. The X-ray source used is the MINI-X2 X-ray tube (Amptek, Bedford, MA, USA) with a maximum power of 4 W (50 kV, 200 μA) and a transmission rhodium anode The choice of this material for the anode was made for several reasons: the characteristic lines of the K series of rhodium are present at relatively high energies and produce very definite Compton and Rayleigh diffusions that can be useful for the quantitative analysis of light matrix materials [3,6,41,42]; rhodium is rarely present in cultural heritage materials and this decreases the possibility of interference with the sample. PIIningmtthheeenltlasasstt2200yeyaerasr,sE,DEXDRXFRhFashparsopverodvteodbetoa bveeray vsueirtyabslueiatnabdlwe iadnedlywusidedeltyooulsfeodr tool ftohre tehxIenamtehxienaalmatisiotnn2a0otifyopenarionsf,tiEpnDagiXsn,RtaiFlnshogasfso, rpailrtsosovfeafdsotrtroietsbspefoaansvsterrayenssdpuoitnsasbteoletaaalnlnyddniwotsnid-tieonltyvaalulssyievdne octohnoa-lirnafovcr-asive Apcmrctpat4fwtpat4faoheoaheoias0ss0aagdanrahcrcenrntrtmdtmtirkdki[h[eheooaeecea44eVVpipeexrhlatrle7ct7ssissooiannt]pl]oloaaa(oe.r(o.mriiytnFanFlnnttAnrAwwsseeniii,ddsfff,og[gnddnllate4bubuwuuaahad0c0li7iaaetenrsslnrl.ta.ee]iy0y0ceonceno.nprTTk(6rsk6scrc7en7FAekeiiagasgees)s)mmnpis4bb,ro,rngiototdo0olconlcfhtAhAaueeffhuhourflpekelo,pr2,po2tonynauVtnee.p.wipowiodsdhiggdTeTnisisim7aeimgisnmghiohiottt)nnniimhmhcalfeof,eneneogdgenftntuncugeeaawhhysstTh0ptnntnsnnneihei,.alnotlnfitff0baaegiaaiabaigogsl6slnyanylcmctcttlptllsseecestesqreqrmeoioitratrkrareunugrlrelesrst2tAnfgaauuigisdmidos.usgyugyrt)mm,riiotsretsretseltwwuuTaiiaaiireureinotnonnsbpsbpynhnhsintngngteegh(hete(tefhdsmmarnytlsytsatattehhsipsaiuprtotoommd(t(eeaneeunfblnlblnerotoacceFeFsifiotioaieattwnwynhgUiUrslrclllonoadadeuirtupeqXfnXfegyaeyereemomuigrsnYne2pYe2rrnntei,r,0er0ehAhsAwww(ssdssr0dr0dimetey))tggaiariwiwitsolstoaliuFiosso(huueuefnfbaaUnfmufnussttbohsdophsii.i.sosnXotorerieiicTecTeisisgldnnnomYotddaetehthssm,,oenontAayapeeaeaartrardcdcaeeo,ssieinonhohowunctucrtdciipdpdasfaantnclctmima)olelletr2tlclcltteseuraaurawyi0ihoheeaddaddynntc0maaiiftntieceecdodsiesoiooskonnkhrnuunnnnnmsmwnntngftgirrde,o,sre-lereloroiactaaiucaaramsmstngododbobsnsdsceivirnneoeeoestidiaeooiuaaeranrdnrdrcscmfnfnstdatastttai.hiiii.ht.tettttoovoplpTioiohohdAmiAononreiircarhenegengn,,yysksnceeatmtmslsl-l-uhnahahadmsmmamowwssayeeayeabepuiaranasnaemneeonefansnderrdtrktkurrrccsesssoyryeeeesosal-,,i,,maddtftoeieetnrhrnnyngett-. lawanyhdeircsshe, nawslsihboilcdehetpoaelpsnoedrdfooenrpmmenadnqyounfaalcmitaoatrnisvy)ewfaahnceatnolyrdssie)saw,lianhsgeanwqdiutehaanplitingtgamtiwevneitthalanpyaielgyrms,iseitnisitsnlmaoytoerorensu,lyistenifsoutlmore ufaesnaedsfuibsleleannsbidubtlsewetniolslipnbeolretfotborempuesaerffqouurlmatloitacahtqiavureaaclaittneaartilizyveseitsha, enaasnlayatsuqirsue,aaonsftitathaqetiuvpaeignamtniteaanltyti.vsies aisnanloytsoisnilsy nnoott only nfoeatsfiebalesibbulet bwuiltl wnoiltlbneoutsbeefuulsteofuchlatroacchtearrizaecttehreizneattuhreenoafttuhreepoifgtmheenpt.igment

A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 B1 B2 B3 B5
Ceramics
Conclusions
Findings
15. True Versus Forged in the Cultural Heritage Materials
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call