Abstract
The peculiarities of the “domestic” and political worlds’ interactions as well as their impact on the freedom of human choice are considered in the article. The purpose of the article is to analyze political and existential being which can be transformed in the light of collecting or distracting way. The phenomenon of national security is analyzed in theoretical as well as in practical dimension. The first part of the study of separatism is connected with the modern social world’s tendency of social transgression which involves blurring the rules and limits expansion. The frontier concept as the transgressive space, which can be embodied in the form of possibility of political interaction or as a place of a political conflict, is offered. Frontier understanding in the light of a cultural dialogue permits to consider it as a perspective dynamic system in the social projects of common being construction. The second part of the article reveals three main directions of transgression: philosophical and reflexive, ethical and normative, common practices. An idea of correlation between freedom of choice, manifestation of will with the human ability of critical thinking, reflection is offered and proved. Tolerance is defined to be the strategical practice in the process of launching a dialogue program of conflicting political communication.
Highlights
Private, social or political life are the embodiment of routine things. as well as unexpected ones
The natural attraction to stability and the significant spreading of the tendencies towards separatism once again confirm the complicated and contradictory nature of the postmodern world
The multi-directions of postmodernism are determined as a new historical stage of social development, as well as an intensive time for the appearance of new social problems
Summary
Considering the issue of separatism, the concept of transgression defines three vital spheres: philosophical and reflection-oriented, ethical and normative, and the sphere of common practices. Husserl was critical to the historicism of modern thought, he offered a phenomenology of historical types that methodologically actively marked the social and the cultural space, the articulated “history” in a mandatory connection with the experiences of the human being These are “three ways of establishing the world environment based on things and culture – Umwelt, human community and personality specific to human Dasein” (Savin, 2006, p.15), namely naive and mythological historicity; political, professional and phenomenological. Any interpretation of the domestic private world as a community with its historical tradition leads to its consideration in the light of a primordial general space, within which humans exist as empirical subjects. It causes lively debates in the scientific and political space, in light of social phenomena, it is a rule for the coexistence of a great variety of culturally different subjects and a way of communication aimed at establishing equal relations between different cultures, while avoiding their division into a dominant and a subordinate or marginal side, maintaining, at the same time, their cultural heritage and recognition
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
