Future of Heritage – A Condition for Space Integrity

Abstract

“My ideal, however is not to erase national characteristics in the manner leading towards intellectually uniform humanity. To the contrary, long live the variety of all forms and colors on our dear planet Earth. Beautiful is the existence of many races and peoples, multitude of languages, different mentalities and worldviews. If I feel the hostility and irreconcilable intolerance towards wars, conquering and annexations, it is caused by many reasons but mostly because of the fact that many organic, highly individual and sumptuous achievements of human civilization had been victim of those dark forces. I’m the opponent of “grands simplificateurs” and a fan of quality, original skill and uniqueness”. Herman Hesse, a part of his address while being awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1946.1 Globalization, traditional values, rural architectural heritage, active protection of rural architectural heritage, integral active space protection, cultural landscape, cultural tourism, typology of rural architecture, methodology for identification and preservation of architectural heritage, identification and preservation of authenticity of rural architectural heritage, cultural landscape, ethno villages, methodology of the protection of integral rural spaces. Researches, which tackle or deeply intrude into tradition and the traditional within architectural heritage, only under superficial assessment, may create conflict with globalization in the widest sense. The changes of the general picture of the world happening on the architectural plan, which will certainly stop to manifest in such intensity in the times to come, are, on one side, the result of “exhibitionism” to which the investors are ready, and the result of the economic momentum that is actually passing by which marked its existence with unique facilities of universal characteristics, with no stylish and traditional characteristics, with extraordinary technological performances.