Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are emerging and promising platforms for carrying different types of cameras for remote sensing. The application of multispectral vegetation indices for ground cover classification has been widely adopted and has proved its reliability. However, the fusion of spectral bands and vegetation indices for machine learning-based land surface investigation has hardly been studied. In this paper, we studied the fusion of spectral bands information from UAV multispectral images and derived vegetation indices for almond plantation classification using several machine learning methods. We acquired multispectral images over an almond plantation using a UAV. First, a multispectral orthoimage was generated from the acquired multispectral images using SfM (Structure from Motion) photogrammetry methods. Eleven types of vegetation indexes were proposed based on the multispectral orthoimage. Then, 593 data points that contained multispectral bands and vegetation indexes were randomly collected and prepared for this study. After comparing six machine learning algorithms (Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbor, Linear Discrimination Analysis, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting), we selected three (SVM, KNN, and LDA) to study the fusion of multi-spectral bands information and derived vegetation index for classification. With the vegetation indexes increased, the model classification accuracy of all three selected machine learning methods gradually increased, then dropped. Our results revealed that that: (1) spectral information from multispectral images can be used for machine learning-based ground classification, and among all methods, SVM had the best performance; (2) combination of multispectral bands and vegetation indexes can improve the classification accuracy comparing to only spectral bands among all three selected methods; (3) among all VIs, NDEGE, NDVIG, and NDVGE had consistent performance in improving classification accuracies, and others may reduce the accuracy. Machine learning methods (SVM, KNN, and LDA) can be used for classifying almond plantation using multispectral orthoimages, and fusion of multispectral bands with vegetation indexes can improve machine learning-based classification accuracy if the vegetation indexes are properly selected.

Highlights

  • While many studies used machine learning methods to build models based on spectral bands for ground classification [23], the nonlinear information contained in vegetation indexes has barely been fused into ground classification models

  • This study showed that a properly selected combination of Vis with original multispectral bands could improve the accuracy of the trained model, and a reasonable VI combination could further improve it

  • This paper describes the application of a Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)-based five-band multispectral camera for the classification of three different ground covers, trees, soil, and shadow at first

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vegetation indices have long been used in remote sensing [19,20,21] because they are simple, intuitionistic, and effective ways to model the ground cover reflectance. In drone-based remote sensing, sensor and ground resolution are improved, vegetation indices alone cannot provide sufficient accuracy for classification [22]. While many studies used machine learning methods to build models based on spectral bands for ground classification [23], the nonlinear information contained in vegetation indexes has barely been fused into ground classification models. A rapid and accurate shadow classification is needed for almost all remote sensing platforms, including satellite, aircraft, and UAVs. Machine learning is widely adopted in remote sensing for ground classification, texture segmentation. We comprehensively compared the results trained with vegetation indexes and determined the proper selection protocol for classification

Study Area
Data Collection and Image Selection
Selection of Spectra
Randomly points for reflectance
Vegetation Index
Supervised Learning Methods
VIs’ Normalization for Fusion Study
Results
The Performance of A accuracy of theSingle
Schematic diagrameffect of classification effect under different
The Performance of Multiple VIs
Classification
Classification Accuracy
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.