Fusion imaging for pulmonary artery embolization: impact on fluoroscopy duration and contrast agent exposure.

Abstract

To assess the impact of fusion imaging guidance on fluoroscopy duration and volume of contrast agent used for pulmonary artery embolization. Thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary artery embolization for pulmonary arterio-venous malformation (n = 28) or hemoptysis (n = 6) were retrospectively included. In the experimental group (n = 15), patients were treated using fusion imaging with 2D/3D registration. In the control group (n = 19), no fusion imaging has been used. Fluoroscopy duration and amount of contrast used were measured and intergroup comparison was performed. The average volume of contrast agent used for embolization in the fusion group (118.3 ml) was significantly lower than in the control group (285.3 ml) (p < 0.002). The mean fluoroscopy duration was not significantly different between both groups (19.5 min in the fusion group vs 31.4 min in the control group (p = 0.10)). No significant difference was observed regarding the average X-ray exposure (Air Kerma) (p = 0.68 in the univariate analysis). Technical success rate was 100% for both groups. Fusion imaging significantly reduces contrast medium volumes needed to perform pulmonary artery embolization. The fluoroscopy duration and the X-ray exposure did not vary significantly. CTA-based fusion imaging using 2D-3D registration is a valuable tool for performing pulmonary artery embolization, helpful for planning and guiding catheterization.Compared to the traditional imaging guidance, fusion imaging reduces the volume of contrast agent used.