Abstract
more detail his 'ecological' hypothesis of pictorial perception. In a previous article [2] I commented upon some possible flaws in Gibson's hypothesis. Although I believe that, in general, Gibson's hypothesis is one of the more fruitful contemporary analyses of art, his latest formulation still contains, I believe, some problems. 1. Gibson's hypothesis contains at its core the following assumption: the analysis of picture perception should be separated from the analysis of the perception of the environment, what may be called 'world perception'. This separation of picture perception from world perception casts serious doubts upon most contemporary psychological analyses of perception since, as Gibson remarks, most psychologists rely upon the use of 2dimensional diagrams in their perceptual experiments. If
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
