Abstract
The results of a previous experiment had indicated that the final words in a free-recall list were retrieved least well in a second recall session. This “negative recency effect” was found to hold for reminiscence items and, to some extent, for prior list intrusions in recall. Two further experiments showed that words retrieved in free recall were subsequently recognized less well if they had been presented late in their original input list. There was some evidence that a pattern of primacy and negative recency also held for the recognition of words not retrieved in free recall. It was concluded that terminal words in a free-recall list, although best recalled immediately, are thereafter least available in memory.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.