Abstract

The IRR (dollar-weighted return) reflects the periodic addition or withdrawal of funds by investors, and the difference between IRR and geometric mean is widely used to indicate the impact that the timing of these flows has had on investor returns. This is a biased measure, since it is also affected by investment flows which “chase” previous strong returns. A method has previously been derived for separating this bias from genuine timing effects. This paper demonstrates that using in-sample mean returns for this decomposition causes an additional bias which again misleadingly suggests bad investor timing. This paper quantifies this bias, allowing unbiased investor timing effects to be estimated. A proper understanding of these biases is of significant practical importance, since investors are often presented with biased timing indicators based on IRRs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.