Abstract

Abstract Plants have evolved resistance traits that negatively affect attackers, and tolerance traits that sustain plant growth despite herbivore damage. These mechanisms often co‐occur in a mixed‐defence strategy, balancing resistance and tolerance. These plant defences can be enhanced upon interaction with soil micro‐organisms. Here we investigated the effects of volatiles emitted by soil‐borne fungi on plant defence to insect herbivory, and on plant phenology. We exposed roots of Brassica rapa plants to volatiles emitted by four soil‐borne fungi. As a proxy of plant resistance, we assessed the performance of Pieris brassicae, a caterpillar feeding on leaves and inflorescences, and of Delia radicum, an insect root herbivore. As a proxy of plant tolerance, we compared growth of volatile‐exposed plants challenged with or without insects. Additionally, we assessed the effects on plant phenology by recording bolting time and by counting the number of buds and flowers. Plant exposure to fungal volatiles differentially affected plant resistance to above‐ and below‐ground herbivory. Performance of P. brassicae caterpillars differed between the fungal volatile‐exposed plants but was variable between experimental batches. In contrast, the effects of fungal volatiles on D. radicum performance were predominantly negative, indicating an increased plant resistance. Despite root consumption by D. radicum, root dry weight remained unchanged in infested plants compared with uninfested ones, irrespectively of the volatile exposure, suggesting compensation for the tissue loss, sometimes at the cost of undamaged above‐ground tissues. When B. rapa plants were attacked by P. brassicae caterpillars, only exposure to volatiles of some fungi led to compensation for the loss of above‐ground tissues consumed by the caterpillars, which differed between leaves and inflorescences. Furthermore, bolting was accelerated in response to volatiles of some fungi, resulting in more buds and flowers, which suggests a potential enhancement of plant fitness. Our data show that fungal volatiles can modulate the mixed‐defence strategies of B. rapa plants, balancing plant resistance and tolerance to above‐ and below‐ground herbivory. These effects may be variable and were fungus specific. Ultimately, plant fitness may be enhanced upon root exposure to fungal volatiles. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

Highlights

  • Plants are part of complex and dynamic communities, coined as the phytobiome (Leach, Triplett, Argueso, & Trivedi, 2017)

  • When B. rapa plants were attacked by P. brassicae caterpillars, only exposure to volatiles of some fungi led to compensation for the loss of above-ground tissues consumed by the caterpillars, which differed between leaves and inflorescences

  • Herbivory by P. brassicae caterpillars resulted in a reduction of B. rapa plant weight compared to uninfested plants. These tissue losses differed between leaves and inflorescences and between fungal volatile exposures. These findings suggest that compensatory plant growth to herbivory may result from a reallocation of resources within the plant, for example, from above-ground tissues to roots (Núñez-Farfán, Fornoni, & Valverde, 2007; van Dam, 2009), and that plant exposure to fungal volatiles can modulate this reallocation between tissues, sometimes at the cost of undamaged tissues

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Plants are part of complex and dynamic communities, coined as the phytobiome (Leach, Triplett, Argueso, & Trivedi, 2017). Microbial volatiles can enhance plant resistance to fungal, bacterial or oomycete pathogens (Farag, Zhang, & Ryu, 2013; Jain, Varma, Tuteja, & Choudhary, 2017; Kottb, Gigolashvili, Großkinsky, & Piechulla, 2015) and to insect herbivores (Aziz et al, 2016; Cordovez et al, 2017; Moisan et al, 2019) They can do so, either directly by inhibiting the attacker's activity (Bailly & Weisskopf, 2017; Vespermann, Kai, & Piechulla, 2007) or indirectly by eliciting plant resistance (Ryu, Farag, Pare, & Kloepper, 2005; Sharifi & Ryu, 2016). We selected four soil-borne fungi (Fusarium oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani, Ulocladium atrum and Phoma leveillei) that all co-occur and interact with brassicaceous plants, and have a saprophytic phase in their cycle

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Findings
| CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call