Funders’ responsibility to ensure value in research: a self-audit by the Health Research Board Ireland

Anne Cody,Maura Hiney,Patricia Clarke,Mairead O'Driscoll

doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13224.1

Abstract

As a public funder of health research, the Health Research Board (HRB) Ireland has an obligation to manage its funds well and to maximise the value of the research that it funds. Ways in which research funding can be wasted have been examined by researchers over the years, and a seminal series on research waste was published in the Lancet in 2014. The series systematically analysed every step of the funding lifecycle in five major stages and made recommendations to various actors including research funders. Prompted by its participation in the Ensuring Value in Research Funders’ Forum, between June and October 2019 the HRB undertook a self-audit against the 17 recommendations and 35 sub-recommendations identified in the Lancet series. Key HRB staff collated relevant policies and practices regarding each recommendation and sub-recommendation and assessed the HRB’s performance under each heading. The self-assessment reflects the state of HRB policies and practices in October 2019. Of the 17 recommendations, two were found not to apply to the HRB. Of the remaining 15 recommendations covering 33 sub-recommendations, five were found to be areas of strength and six were found to be areas of partial strength. These 11 recommendations encompass 22 sub-recommendations. Areas of strength reflect work over many years such as support for evidence synthesis, strong processes around award selection, driving research integrity and open data including an HRB-funded open publishing platform. Four recommendations were found to be areas for growth. These mostly revolve around real time reporting of study protocols and of ongoing funded research outside of clinical trials. Work is progressing to address some of these areas.

Highlights

Funders of health research typically receive money from members of the public directly in the case of charitable organisations or via taxation in the case of state agencies
The self-assessment reflects the state of Health Research Board (HRB) policies and practices in October 2019
Ways in which research waste can occur have been examined by researchers over the years (Chalmers & Glasziou, 2009), leading to the publication in 2014 of a series in the Lancet, put together by Chalmers and Glasziou, (Chalmers et al, 2014), (Ioannidis et al, 2014), (Salman et al, 2014), (Chan et al, 2014) and (Glasziou et al, 2014) that systematically analysed every step of the funding lifecycle in five major stages

Summary

Introduction

Funders of health research typically receive money from members of the public directly in the case of charitable organisations or via taxation in the case of state agencies. Research waste occurs when the use of money and/or effort is not optimal. Ways in which research waste can occur have been examined by researchers over the years (Chalmers & Glasziou, 2009), leading to the publication in 2014 of a series in the Lancet, put together by Chalmers and Glasziou, (Chalmers et al, 2014), (Ioannidis et al, 2014), (Salman et al, 2014), (Chan et al, 2014) and (Glasziou et al, 2014) that systematically analysed every step of the funding lifecycle in five major stages These include 1) funding research that is relevant to knowledge users, 2) ensuring appropriate design, methods and analysis, 3) efficient research regulation and management, 4) information about the research being fully accessible, and 5) unbiased and useable research reports. It spelled out recommendations for funders, researchers, research performing institutions, publishers, policy makers, regulators and research ethics committees

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion