Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and ReviewsFundamentals of Language. Roman Jakobson , Morris Halle Noam ChomskyNoam Chomsky Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by International Journal of American Linguistics Volume 23, Number 3Jul., 1957 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/464414 Views: 9Total views on this site Citations: 35Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Charles Reiss, Veno Volenec Naturalism, Internalism, and Nativism: < What > The Legacy of The Sound Pattern of English < Should Be >, (Jun 2021): 96–108.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119598732.ch6Yanying Cui, Yidong Wei Reduction: The Solution to Mind Representation?, Chinese Semiotic Studies 15, no.33 (Aug 2019): 303–315.https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2019-0019Andrea Scaiewicz, Michael Levitt The language of the protein universe, Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 35 (Dec 2015): 50–56.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2015.08.010Morris Halle The Stress of English Words 1968–1998, Linguistic Inquiry 29, no.44 (Oct 1998): 539–568.https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553879S. Ullman Against direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 373–381.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000546XO. J. Braddick Direct perception: an opponent and a precursor of computational theories, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 381–382.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005471Bruce Bridgeman Direct perception and a call for primary perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 382–383.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005483Jonathan F. Doner, Joseph S. Lappin The function and process of perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 383–384.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005495William Epstein Direct perception or mediated perception: a comparison of rival viewpoints, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 384–385.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005501Stephen Grossberg Direct perception or adaptive resonance?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 385–386.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005513John W. Gyr Visual perception is underdetermined by stimulation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 386–386.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005525Frederick Hayes-Roth Mediating the so-called immediate processes of perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 386–387.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005537Geoffrey E. Hinton Inferring the meaning of direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 387–388.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005549Gunnar Johansson, Claes von Hofsten, Gunnar Jansson Direct perception and perceptual processes, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 388–388.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005550Rebecca K. Jones, Anne D. Pick On the nature of information in behalf of direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 388–389.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005562Samuel Jay Keyser, Steven Pinker Direct vs. representational views of cognition: A parallel between vision and phonology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 389–390.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005574J. J. Koenderink Why argue about direct perception?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 390–391.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005586Geoffrey R. Loftus, Elizabeth F. Loftus Visual perception: the shifting domain of discourse, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 391–392.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005598William M. Mace Perceptual activity and direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 392–393.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005604Alan K. Mackworth Are mediating representations the ghosts in the machine?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 393–394.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005616K. Prazdny How wrong is Gibson?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 394–395.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005628Sandra S. Prindle, Claudia Carello, M. T. Turvey Animal-environment mutuality and direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 395–397.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000563XEdward S. Reed Information pickup is the activity of perceiving, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 397–398.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005641Irvin Rock Difficulties with a direct theory of perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 398–399.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005653Sverker Runeson There is more to psychological meaningfulness than computation and representation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 399–400.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005665Robert Shaw, James Todd Abstract machine theory and direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 400–401.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005677Aaron Sloman What kind of indirect process is visual perception?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 401–404.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005689K. von Fieandt In defense of invariances and higher-order stimuli, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 404–405.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005690Walter B. Welmer Logical atomism and computation do not refute Gibson, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 405–405.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005707Wally Welker Percepts, intervening variables, and neural mechanisms, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 405–406.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005719Steven W. Zucker The computational/representational paradigm as normal science: further support, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 406–407.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005720Carl B. Zuckerman What are the contributions of the direct perception approach?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 407–408.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005732S. Ullman Perception, information, and computation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 408–415.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005744W. Meyer-Eppler Akustische und optische Valenzklassen als Zeichenträger, (Jan 1969): 346–413.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86901-3_9W. Meyer-Eppler Akustische und optische Valenzklassen als Zeichenträger, (Jan 1959): 282–329.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52949-8_9

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.