Abstract
This paper examines three key judgments of the European Court of Justice in matters relating to criminal justice and security: addressing the Passenger Name Record Agreements, Data Retention Directive and targeted asset-freezing sanctions. It argues that faced with increasing criminal justice and security action at EU level, the European judiciary have struggled to articulate a clear position on fundamental rights and security.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
