Abstract
The contribution examines the distinction between horizontal direct and indirect effect of fundamental rights. The German concept of mittelbare and unmittelbare Drittwirkung with respect to Grundrechte (basic constitutional rights) and the ECJ's approach to private threats to the free movement provisions are analysed briefly. This analysis then allows for consideration of the validity and value of the distinction. Private autonomy and the question of competencies emerge as the main issues to be considered when applying fundamental rights to private acts. It is maintained that the respect for both private autonomy and for the distribution of competencies argue against the horizontal direct effect and in favour of an indirect approach.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
