Abstract
Results of investigations from many old landfills in Germany and Europe indicate that significant emissions occur under conventional landfill operating conditions (i.e., anaerobic conditions). Significant emissions via the gas phase are predicted to last at least three decades after landfill closure, while leachate emissions are predicted to continue for many decades, potentially even lasting for centuries. When considering the specific type and quality, and quite often lack of, protection barriers associated with old landfills, these leachate and gas emissions may result in a significant negative impact on the environment. However, complete sealing of the landfill only temporarily reduces emissions because dry-conservation of the biodegradable waste fraction results, thus not allowing any severe reduction in the emission and hazardous potential of the landfill to occur. If noticeable damage of the surface capping system occurred in these landfills, infiltrating water would restart the interrupted emission formation. In contrast, aerobic in situ stabilization by means of low pressure aeration attempts to stabilize and modify the inventory of organic matter inside the landfill, acting to reduce the emission potential in a more sustainable manner. By enabling faster and more extensive aerobic degradation processes in the landfill (compared with anaerobic processes), the organics (e.g., hydrocarbons) are degraded significantly faster, resulting in an increased carbon discharge via the gas phase, as well as reduced leachate concentrations. Because carbon dioxide (CO(2)) is the main compound in the extracted off-gas (instead of methane (CH(4)), which dominated under anaerobic landfill conditions), the negative impact of diffuse LFG emissions towards an increased global warming effect may be significantly lowered. With respect to leachate quality, a reduction of organic compounds as well as ammonia-nitrogen can be expected. In addition to these positive ecological effects, aerobic in situ stabilization is associated with significant cost savings potential due to both quantitative and qualitative reductions in the aftercare period. This paper describes the fundamental processes and implications of in situ landfill aeration. Additionally, possible criteria for defining an endpoint of the active aeration process are presented and discussed.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Anaerobic Conditions
Aftercare Period
Leachate Emissions
Landfill Closure
Significant Negative Impact
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Jun 16, 2017
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Sep 1, 2010
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Jan 1, 1987
Water Science and Technology
May 1, 2013
Ecology and Industry of Russia
Sep 21, 2018
Waste Management
Jan 1, 2006
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Jun 1, 1997
European Journal of Plant Pathology
Feb 27, 2007
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A
Jan 14, 2008
Polymer Degradation and Stability
Dec 1, 2016
Jan 1, 2022
Chemical Engineering Journal
Jun 15, 2004
Experimental Parasitology
Aug 1, 1985
Waste Management
Waste Management
Dec 1, 2023
Waste Management
Dec 1, 2023
Waste Management
Dec 1, 2023
Waste Management
Dec 1, 2023
Waste Management
Dec 1, 2023
Waste Management
Dec 1, 2023
Waste Management
Dec 1, 2023
Waste Management
Dec 1, 2023
Waste Management
Dec 1, 2023
Waste Management
Dec 1, 2023