Abstract

Perennial wall rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia [L.] DC.) and annual garden rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.) are cultivated around the world as salad crops and as an ingredient of condiments. From a botanical perspective these species are classified in the Rapa/Oleracea linage, which is consistent with their similar morphological characteristics, chromosomal number and the diversity of glucosinolates. It is understandable that these species have been informally grouped together for convenience. However, the evaluation of a wide range of factors over a typical production cycle has clearly illustrated that these species should be considered distinct crops from a commercial perspective. We will demonstrate with examples why these species should be managed differently and considered commercially distinct crops.

Highlights

  • Baby leaf rocket has become a popular crop in recent years due to its taste and appearance in mesclun-type salads (Bell & Wagstaff, 2014)

  • From a botanical perspective these species are classified in the Rapa/Oleracea linage, which is consistent with their similar morphological characteristics, chromosomal number and the diversity of glucosinolates

  • There are two common types of rocket grown commercially, a perennial species known as perennial wall rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia [L.] DC.) and an annual species known as annual garden rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Baby leaf rocket has become a popular crop in recent years due to its taste and appearance in mesclun-type salads (Bell & Wagstaff, 2014). The leaves of cultivars of these species have been bred to look similar, allowing for a year-round supply of produce (Hall et al, 2012a) Due to their similar appearance and recent commercial cultivation, growers tend to manage the growth and postharvest storage of these crops in a similar way. This generic management of species may have negative implications on yield and nutritional quality of produce. These species are often grouped together for convenience, there are clear similarities and differences between the plants, which can influence their responses to abiotic factors during growth and storage

Germination Characteristics
Response to Abiotic Factors
Fundamental Differences
Leaf Nutrients and Postharvest Stability
The Cultivars of These Species Should Not Be Considered Botanically Similar
Differences between the Species Impact on Commercial Production
Findings
Further Understanding and Improvement of Rocket Species
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call