Fundamental aspects of symmetry and order parameter coupling for martensitic transition sequences in Heusler alloys. Erratum

Michael A Carpenter,Christopher J Howard

doi:10.1107/s2052520620012445

Abstract

In the course of further studies of phase transitions in martensites [Driver, Salje, Howard, Lampronti, Ding & Carpenter (2020), Phys. Rev. B, 102, 014105], errors were uncovered in a few entries in Table 3 of the paper by Carpenter & Howard [(2018), Acta Cryst. B74, 560–573]. The required corrections are given here.

Highlights

Ti50Pd50–;xCrx martensites (Driver et al, 2020), we found there were errors in some entries in Table 3 in the paper by Carpenter & Howard (2018): (i) The dimensions of the rhombohedral cell associated with space group P3, recorded in the second last column, should be amended to read 3a0, 3a0, 3a0
The columns show the structure symbol in the ‘old’ notation, the k for the corresponding structure in Carpenter & Howard Table 3, the values of the unit-cell parameter ratios and monoclinic angles derived from the experimental values in the penultimate column of Otsuka’s Table 1
As pointed out by Delaey & Chandrasekaran (1995), the structure can be described using a primitive monoclinic cell constructed from the first complete stacking sequence, in this case just ð21Þ

Summary

Introduction

Ti50Pd50–;xCrx martensites (Driver et al, 2020), we found there were errors in some entries in Table 3 in the paper by Carpenter & Howard (2018):. Rev. B, 102, 014105], errors were uncovered in a few entries in Table 3 of the paper by Carpenter & Howard [(2018), Acta Cryst.

Results

Conclusion