Functional roles of muscarinic M 2 and M 3 receptors in mouse stomach motility: Studies with muscarinic receptor knockout mice

Abstract

Functional roles of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the regulation of mouse stomach motility were examined using mice genetically lacking muscarinic M 2 receptor and/or M 3 receptor and their corresponding wild-type (WT) mice. Single application of carbachol (1 nM–30 μM) produced concentration-dependent contraction in antral and fundus strips from muscarinic M 2 receptor knockout (M 2R-KO) and M 3 receptor knockout (M 3R-KO) mice but not in those from M 2 and M 3 receptors double knockout (M 2/M 3R-KO) mice. A comparison of the concentration–response curves with those for WT mice showed a significant decrease in the negative logarithm of EC 50 (pEC 50) value (M 2R-KO) or amplitude of maximum contraction (M 3R-KO) in the muscarinic receptor-deficient mice. The tonic phase of carbachol-induced contraction was decreased in gastric strips from M 3R-KO mice. Antagonistic affinity for 4-diphenylacetoxy- N-methyl-piperidine (4-DAMP) or 11-([2-[(diethylamino)methyl]-1-piperdinyl]acetyl)-5,11-dihydro-6H-pyrido[2,3-b][1,4]benzodiazepine-6-one (AF-DX116) indicated that the contractile responses in M 2R-KO and M 3R-KO mice were mediated by muscarinic M 3 and M 2 receptors, respectively. Electrical field stimulation (EFS, 0.5–32 Hz) elicited frequency-dependent contraction in physostigmine- and N ω-nitro- l-arginine methylester ( l-NAME)-treated fundic and antral strips from M 2R-KO and M 3R-KO mice, but the cholinergic contractile components decreased significantly compared with those in WT mice. In gastric strips from M 2/M 3R-KO mice, cholinergic contractions elicited by EFS were not observed but atropine-resistant contractions were more conspicuous than those in gastric strips from WT mice. Gastric emptying in WT mice and that in M 2/M 3R-KO mice were comparable, suggesting that motor function of the stomach in the KO mice did not differ from that in the WT mice. The results indicate that both muscarinic M 2 and M 3 receptors but not other subtypes mediate carbachol- or EFS-induced contraction in the mouse stomach but that the contribution of each receptor to concentration–response relationships is distinguishable. Although there was impairment of nerve-mediated cholinergic responses in the stomach of KO mice, gastric emptying in KO mice was the same as that in WT mice probably due to the compensatory enhancement of the non-cholinergic contraction pathway.