Abstract

Purpose: to identify the features of the impact of aquafitness training on aerobic and anaerobic productivity of women 25-35 years.
 Material and methods: The study involved women aged 25-35 in the number of 41 people. For 24 weeks, the subjects were training in an aquafitness program. Training sessions of aquafitness were aerobic and strength. Anaerobic alactate productivity of the organism was determined by the Wingate anaerobic test WAnT 10. Anaerobic lactate productivity of the organism was determined by the Wingate anaerobic test WAnT 30 and bicycle ergometric test by the method of A. Shogy, G. Cherebetin. The threshold of anaerobic metabolism was determined by bicycle ergometric test F. Conconi et al. in the modification of Yu.M. Furman. The aerobic productivity of the organism was investigated according to the Vo2 max index determined by the method of V.L. Karpman. Absolute and relative indicators were determined for all tests.
 Results: Aquafitness is an effective means of correcting the indicators of functional preparedness. The combination of strength and aerobic training in the aquafitness program provides an increase in aerobic productivity, anaerobic lactatic productivity and anaerobic alactatic productivity. Under the influence of training according to the aquafitness program, an increase in all indicators of functional preparedness was revealed. The power of anaerobic alactate productivity of the organism determined by the relative indicator WAnT 10 increased with a statistically significant difference on the level (t = 5.07; p = 0.000). The power of anaerobic lactate productivity of the organism determined by the relative indicator WAnT 30 increased with a statistically significant difference on the level (t=4,68; p=0,000). The power of aerobic productivity of the organism determined by the relative indicator VO2 max increased with a statistically significant difference on the level (t=2,77; p=0,007).
 Conclusions: Aquafitness is an effective means of correcting the indicators of functional preparedness. The combination of strength and aerobic training in the aquafitness program provides an increase in aerobic productivity, anaerobic lactatic productivity and anaerobic alactatic productivity.

Highlights

  • We have suggested that due to the wide arsenal of tools and methods used in aqua fitness classes, it Aquafitness, as a type of physical activity in recent years is gaining popularity

  • The fact that we found a greater increase in tendency to decrease the body weight of the subjects, the relative indicators of functional fitness prompted but we did not find a statistically significant us to study the dynamics of body weight of the difference (p> 0.05). subjects

  • The average group value of the body weight of the subjects decreased from 63.7 kg to 61.3 kg. It was this factor that caused a large increase in the relative indicators WAT 10 WAT 30 MAEMW, Anaerobic metabolism threshold (AMT), VO2 max, compared with the absolute

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We have suggested that due to the wide arsenal of tools and methods used in aqua fitness classes, it Aquafitness, as a type of physical activity in recent years is gaining popularity. Women aged 2535 predominate among the visitors of aqua fitness is possible to influence all energy supply systems of muscular activity: aerobic, anaerobic lactate and anaerobic lactate. V. Golovkina introduced aqua fitness period, the tasks of women's adaptation to the classes in the process of training athletes-swimmers conditions of the aquatic environment, the formation aged 11-12 [8]. Henrique Pereira Neiva et al [13] found a positive a gradual increase in the intensity of the load effect of exercise in the aquatic environment on alternately included aids that complicate the physical fitness and health indicators in women 59 ± performance of exercises The power of anaerobic lactate energy supply processes was determined using the Wingat anaerobic test WAT 10 This test is to perform a bicycle ergometric load lasting 10 s with the maximum possible pedaling frequency. The difference was considered significant at a significance level of p

Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call