Abstract
During the last decade surgical therapy of Parkinson's disease has been considerably revalued and electrical stimulation techniques have taken the place of neurolesive techniques. Surgical therapy objective is not a direct solution of the illness cause but to control the symptoms responsible for serious daily life limitations. Electrical stimulation techniques actually used in PD are Deep Brain Stimulation [1] and Motor Cortex Stimulation [2] Advantages of such techniques in comparison with neurolesive techniques are reversibility and adaptability. Deep Brain Stimulation is indicated for patients with PD in which symptoms are not controlled by the pharmacological therapy or that suffer from L-Dopa serious collateral effects. Stimulation system determines high frequency stimulation of anatomic-target structure of motor circuit with consequent functional block. Implanted system is formed by lead and pulse generator. Lead can be stereotactly implanted, monolateral or bilateral, at level of: a) Subthalamic Nucleus for all predominant illness symptom control (tremor, rigidity and akinesia) and L-dopa induced dyskinesias; b) Internal Globus Pallidum for the control of the rigidity and of the dyskinesias, c) VIM Thalamus Nucleus for the exclusive control of tremor. Motor Cortex Stimulation is a technique alternative to DBS indicated in advanced-complicated PD in cases of exclusion from DBS or of its ineffectiveness. Paddle lead is installed with neuronavigation system in epidural or subdural space beyond the motor area, controlaterally to the side where parkinsonian symptoms are prevailing. Stimulation effects are bilateral and stimulation is made with low frequency. Deep Brain Stimulation allows importing benefits suppressing PD symptoms, extending periods in which patient recovers normal and adequate functionality, reducing collateral effects induced by L-Dopa, improving quality of life and decreasing drugs intake. Despite the still limited experience, Motor cortex stimulation is effective in a special way on axial symptoms and also on cognitive performances and autonomic signs. Deep Brain Stimulation and Motor Cortex Stimulation are valid choices for advanced PD therapy. Advantages of such techniques in comparison with neurolesive techniques are safety, reversibility and adaptability.
Highlights
During the last decade surgical therapy of Parkinson’s disease has been considerably revalued and electrical stimulation techniques have taken the place of neurolesive techniques
Deep Brain Stimulation is indicated for patients with PD in which symptoms are not controlled by the pharmacological therapy or that suffer from L-Dopa serious collateral effects
Motor Cortex Stimulation is a technique alternative to DBS indicated in advanced-complicated PD in cases of exclusion from DBS or of its ineffectiveness
Summary
During the last decade surgical therapy of Parkinson’s disease has been considerably revalued and electrical stimulation techniques have taken the place of neurolesive techniques. Electrical stimulation techniques used in PD are Deep Brain Stimulation [1] and Motor Cortex Stimulation [2] Advantages of such techniques in comparison with neurolesive techniques are reversibility and adaptability.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
