Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies traditionally use general linear model-based analysis (GLM-BA) and regularly report task-related activation, deactivation, or no change in activation in separate brain regions. However, several recent fMRI studies using spatial independent component analysis (sICA) find extensive overlap of functional networks (FNs), each exhibiting different task-related modulation (e.g., activation vs. deactivation), different from the dominant findings of GLM-BA. This study used sICA to assess overlap of FNs extracted from four datasets, each related to a different cognitive task. FNs extracted from each dataset overlapped with each other extensively across most or all brain regions and showed task-related concurrent increases, decreases, or no changes in activity. These findings indicate that neural substrates showing task-related concurrent but different modulations in activity intermix with each other and distribute across most of the brain. Furthermore, spatial correlation analyses found that most FNs were highly consistent in spatial patterns across different datasets. This finding indicates that these FNs probably reflect large-scale patterns of task-related brain activity. We hypothesize that FN overlaps as revealed by sICA might relate to functional heterogeneity, balanced excitation and inhibition, and population sparseness of neuron activity, three fundamental properties of the brain. These possibilities deserve further investigation.

Highlights

  • Blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging studies traditionally use a general-linear-model-based analysis (GLM-BA) to interrogate BOLD time series

  • Electrophysiological recordings from monkey brain often find that neurons showing task-related activation, deactivation, or no changes in activation intermix with each other in the same brain regions [1,2,3,4], in contrast to the separated activation and deactivation reported by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) using a GLM-BA

  • This study focused on the first anticipatory phase (A1) of Win $1 (W1) and Win $5 (W5) trials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies traditionally use a general-linear-model-based analysis (GLM-BA) to interrogate BOLD time series. The main findings of the above reviewed studies include: 1) some FNs extracted by sICA overlap with each other extensively, 2) each of the overlapping FNs shows a unique timecourse and/or task-related modulation, 3) some overlapping FNs show opposite task-related modulation (i.e., activation vs deactivation) simultaneously, and 4) GLM-BA may not detect task-related activity in these overlapping regions These findings initially appear to be in conflict with the dominant existing fMRI data of separated activation and deactivation as revealed by GLM-BA, but they do provide an intuitive explanation for the observed brain activity. At the level of large-scale FNs, these properties suggest that: 1) multiple FNs may overlap with each other at any cortical region, with each possibly showing a unique timecourse (i.e., functional heterogeneity); and, 2) some FNs may show concurrent but opposite changes in activity (i.e., balanced E/I) These predicted features of brain functional organization are consistent with the FN overlap as revealed by sICA. FN overlap as revealed by sICA may be interpreted as reflecting balanced E/I and functional heterogeneity in the brain and warrants further study

Aim of this study
Participants
Results
Findings unique to each task
Findings across tasks
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.