Abstract

A large literature in social neuroscience has associated the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) with the processing of self-related information. However, only recently have social neuroscience studies begun to consider the large behavioral literature showing a strong self-positivity bias, and these studies have mostly focused on its correlates during self-related judgments and decision-making. We carried out a functional MRI (fMRI) study to ask whether the mPFC would show effects of the self-positivity bias in a paradigm that probed participants’ self-concept without any requirement of explicit self-judgment. We presented social vignettes that were either self-relevant or non-self-relevant with a neutral, positive or negative outcome described in the second sentence. In previous work using event-related potentials, this paradigm has shown evidence of a self-positivity bias that influences early stages of semantically processing incoming stimuli. In the present fMRI study, we found evidence for this bias within the mPFC: an interaction between self-relevance and valence, with only positive scenarios showing a self vs other effect within the mPFC. We suggest that the mPFC may play a role in maintaining a positively biased self-concept and discuss the implications of these findings for the social neuroscience of the self and the role of the mPFC.

Highlights

  • The relationship between emotion and the self-concept lies at the core of human well-being

  • We carried out a functional MRI study to ask whether the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) would show effects of the self-positivity bias in a paradigm that probed participants’ self-concept without any requirement of explicit self-judgment

  • In the present functional MRI (fMRI) study, we found evidence for this bias within the mPFC: an interaction between self-relevance and valence, with only positive scenarios showing a self vs other effect within the mPFC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The relationship between emotion and the self-concept lies at the core of human well-being. Understanding this complex relationship is critical for understanding motivation, learning and decision-making (Taylor and Brown, 1988; Dunning et al., 2004; Sharot and Garrett, 2016) in both healthy individuals and in neuropsychiatric disorders (Beck et al, 1979; Frith, 1992; Shestyuk and Deldin, 2010; Holt et al, 2011). It is important that we study the cognitive and neural mechanisms by which the self-concept and self-esteem are constructed and maintained. The result is that beliefs are more likely to be updated in response to positive than negative information about ourselves (Sharot and Garrett, 2016)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call