Abstract

In vivo imaging is a platform technology with the power to put function in its natural structural context. With the drive to translate stem cell therapies into pre-clinical and clinical trials, early selection of the right imaging techniques is paramount to success. There are many instances in regenerative medicine where the biological, biochemical, and biomechanical mechanisms behind the proposed function of stem cell therapies can be elucidated by appropriate imaging. Imaging techniques can be divided according to whether labels are used and as to whether the imaging can be done in vivo. In vivo human imaging places additional restrictions on the imaging tools that can be used. Microscopies and nanoscopies, especially those requiring fluorescent markers, have made an extraordinary impact on discovery at the molecular and cellular level, but due to their very limited ability to focus in the scattering tissues encountered for in vivo applications they are largely confined to superficial imaging applications in research laboratories. Nanoscopy, which has tremendous benefits in resolution, is limited to the near-field (e.g. near-field scanning optical microscope (NSNOM)) or to very high light intensity (e.g. stimulated emission depletion (STED)) or to slow stochastic events (photo-activated localization microscopy (PALM) and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM)). In all cases, nanoscopy is limited to very superficial applications. Imaging depth may be increased using multiphoton or coherence gating tricks. Scattering dominates the limitation on imaging depth in most tissues and this can be mitigated by the application of optical clearing techniques that can impose mild (e.g. topical application of glycerol) or severe (e.g. CLARITY) changes to the tissue to be imaged. Progression of therapies through to clinical trials requires some thought as to the imaging and sensing modalities that should be used. Smoother progression is facilitated by the use of comparable imaging modalities throughout the discovery and trial phases, giving label-free techniques an advantage wherever they can be used, although this is seldom considered in the early stages. In this paper, we will explore the techniques that have found success in aiding discovery in stem cell therapies and try to predict the likely technologies best suited to translation and future directions.

Highlights

  • Overview of functional imaging for regenerative medicine Functional imaging, especially when provided in its structural context, provides a platform for all branchesLeahy et al Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2016) 7:57Optimal stem cell tracking probe characteristicOptimal cellular Examples probeProbe disadvantages Imaging modalityAbsorbance/emission Fluorescence spectra within “optical window”Reporter genes, quantum dots, exogenous probes (e.g. PKH26)Requires genetic modification and excitation light, high FLI background due to autofluorescence, signal loss with cell division, low depth of imaging, limited spatial resolutionBioluminescence Reporter genesRequires genetic modification and exogenous substrate BLI administration

  • It was shown that PTOCT imaging together with the single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) nanoprobes looks promising for visualising and tracking of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) in vitro and in vivo

  • Another possibility is multimodal imaging, which may minimise the potential drawbacks of using each imaging modality alone [17], such as the combination of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and other imaging techniques

Read more

Summary

Background

A well-chosen imaging technique provides a means to produce high-impact discovery and validation data for the translation of novel regenerative therapies, but choosing the right imaging tool can be tricky and is too often biased by familiarity. We try to provide, in this paper, a means to compare the best known imaging technologies in terms of their capabilities and limitations for stem cell research. The techniques are discussed in more detail in the following paragraphs. University of Ireland (NUI), Galway, Ireland 5Chair of Applied Physics, National University of Ireland (NUI), Galway, Ireland

Main text
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call