Abstract

Abstract Aims To investigate whether there are functional brain differences, or differences in global network measures, between patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and non-obstructive coronary arteries and patients with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and healthy controls. Methods and results In this single centre, prospective cohort study, all patients <80 years who presented to a tertiary cardiac centre with a suspected acute coronary syndrome and who had non-obstructive coronary arteries on invasive angiography were approached for inclusion. Age and sex matched patients presenting with a STEMI and a further group of healthy volunteers were recruited as control groups. All patients received routine clinical care and investigations and underwent additional psychological questionnaires, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and functional brain imaging within 14 days of admission. Image pre-processing and analysis was undertaken in a blinded fashion. 72 participants, in addition to 27 STEMI controls and 28 healthy controls, were recruited. Median age in the participant group was 57 years (IQR 47–66 years) and patients were scanned 6 days (IQR 3–8 days) from admission. Patients with ACS and non-obstructive arteries had increased functional connectivity in the default mode network and reduced connectivity in the central executive network compared to controls (Figure 1). They also had higher anxiety scores compared to STEMI and healthy controls and higher depression and stress scores compared to healthy controls (Figure 2). There was no difference in any global network measure between participants and age and sex matched controls however high anxiety or stress scores were associated with lower global efficiency in patients with ACS and non-obstructive coronary arteries but not in controls (Figure 2). Conclusion Patients with ACS and non-obstructive coronary arteries are distinct from both the STEMI and healthy population in terms of their psychological and neurofunctional state and this may have important future therapeutic implications for patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): James Tudor FoundationRosetrees Trust

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call