Abstract

A shared principle in the evolution of language and the development of speech is the emergence of functional flexibility, the capacity of vocal signals to express a range of emotional states independently of context and biological function. Functional flexibility has recently been demonstrated in the vocalisations of pre-linguistic human infants, which has been contrasted to the functionally fixed vocal behaviour of non-human primates. Here, we revisited the presumed chasm in functional flexibility between human and non-human primate vocal behaviour, with a study on our closest living primate relatives, the bonobo (Pan paniscus). We found that wild bonobos use a specific call type (the “peep”) across a range of contexts that cover the full valence range (positive-neutral-negative) in much of their daily activities, including feeding, travel, rest, aggression, alarm, nesting and grooming. Peeps were produced in functionally flexible ways in some contexts, but not others. Crucially, calls did not vary acoustically between neutral and positive contexts, suggesting that recipients take pragmatic information into account to make inferences about call meaning. In comparison, peeps during negative contexts were acoustically distinct. Our data suggest that the capacity for functional flexibility has evolutionary roots that predate the evolution of human speech. We interpret this evidence as an example of an evolutionary early transition away from fixed vocal signalling towards functional flexibility.

Highlights

  • A growing body of research suggests that human infant vocal development reveals something about the evolutionary history of language (Tomasello et al, 2005; Locke & Bogin, 2006; Tomasello, 2008)

  • Acoustic structure of peeps We compared the acoustic structure of peeps produced in different contexts that were associated with different emotion valences, Fig. 1 and that generated the most peep vocalisations across individuals

  • Results from a cross-validated discriminant function analysis revealed that while the Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) model generated two significant discriminant functions (Wilks Lambda: 0.550, χ 2 = 80.007, P < .001), peeps produced in association with positive valence contexts could not be reliably discriminated from those produced in all other contexts: the functions only classified 49.3% of the calls correctly, which was below chance level (Binomial test (0.14) P > 0.05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A growing body of research suggests that human infant vocal development reveals something about the evolutionary history of language (Tomasello et al, 2005; Locke & Bogin, 2006; Tomasello, 2008). This is thought to contrast with animal signals and some human vocalisations (e.g., crying, laughter), which are tightly linked to specific psychological and motivational states (Oller et al, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call