Abstract

Introduction: Deficits in neurocognitive mechanisms such as inhibition control and cognitive flexibility have been suggested to mediate the symptoms in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). These mechanisms are proposedly controlled by the “affective” and “executive” orbitofronto-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuits with well-documented morphological and functional alterations in OCD that are associated with OCD symptoms. The precuneus region has been suggested in OCD as another key structure associated with the mechanism of “thought–action fusion.” Our study aimed to elucidate the association of the altered functional coupling of the CSTC nodes (and precuneus), the OCD symptoms, and interference control/cognitive flexibility.Methods: In a group of 36 (17 medicated and 19 drug-free) OCD patients and matched healthy volunteers, we tested functional connectivity (FC) within the constituents of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex “executive” CSTC, the orbitofrontal cortex/anterior cingulate “affective” CSTC, and precuneus. The functional connections showing the strongest effects were subsequently entered as explanatory variables to multiple regression analyses to identify possible associations between observed alterations of functional coupling and cognitive (Stroop test) and clinical measures (obsessions, compulsions, and anxiety level).Results: We observed increased FC (FWE p < 0.05 corr.) between CSTC seeds and regions of the parieto-occipital cortex, and between the precuneus and the angular gyrus and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Decreased FC was observed within the CSTC loop (caudate nucleus and thalamus) and between the anterior cingulate cortex and the limbic lobe. Linear regression identified a relationship between the altered functional coupling of thalamus with the right somatomotor parietal cortex and the Stroop color–word score. Similar association of thalamus FC has been identified also for obsessions severity. No association was observed for compulsions and anxiety.Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate altered FC in OCD patients with a prevailing increase in FC originating in CSTC regions toward other cortical areas, and a decrease in FC within the constituents of CSTC loops. Moreover, our results support the role of precuneus in OCD. The association of the cognitive and clinical symptoms with the FC between the thalamus and somatomotor cortex indicates that cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control are strongly linked and both mechanisms might contribute to the symptomatology of OCD.

Highlights

  • Deficits in neurocognitive mechanisms such as inhibition control and cognitive flexibility have been suggested to mediate the symptoms in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD)

  • The severity of obsessions and compulsions in patients was assessed on the day of fMRI session using the Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale [Y-BOCS; [51]] and current anxiety was evaluated by the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A, [52]]

  • The main finding of this study is the alterations of functional connectivity (FC) in the OCD patients with prevailing decrease in cortical constituents of both affective (ACC) and executive (DLPFC) controlled by the “affective” and “executive” orbitofronto-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) loops, and both increased and decreased connections from subcortical striatal and thalamic regions and PCU

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Deficits in neurocognitive mechanisms such as inhibition control and cognitive flexibility have been suggested to mediate the symptoms in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Alterations proposed in OCD include both inhibitory control (inhibition of motor responses in means of increased impulsivity and/or compulsivity) and the cognitive flexibility processes defined as an ability to shift the focus of attention [6, 7] and/or recognize and handle conflicting information (competition of relevant and irrelevant stimuli) [8]. The inhibitory control could be affected at three consecutive stages of inhibitory control, the early interference control (closely associated with the cognitive flexibility in means of maintenance of conflicting information), the intermediate action restraint/suppression, and the late process of action cancelation [3, 9]. We argue that these inhibitory and executive cognitive processes cannot be fully separated when using cognitive/behavioral tasks

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.