Abstract

AbstractBackgroundImaging studies showed early atrophy of the cholinergic basal forebrain in prodromal sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and alterations of the posterior basal forebrain functional connectivity in amyloid positive, but cognitively normal people. Similar investigations in familial cases of AD are still lacking. Here we investigated whether basal forebrain volume, metabolism, and posterior connectivity were already reduced in preclinical stages of autosomal dominant AD.MethodWe analyzed baseline data from 242 cognitively unimpaired subjects (69% PSEN1 E280A mutation carriers; mean age = 38 years; 62% female; mean education = 9 years) enrolled in the API ADAD Colombia Trial including available MRI, FDG‐PET and cognitive measures. We determined volume and metabolism of the basal forebrain, and of the hippocampus as a comparison region. In addition, we created connectivity maps from resting state fMRI data using anterior and posterior BF seed regions. We carried out Bayesian ANCOVA to determine evidence in favor or against an effect of carriers’ status on volumes, metabolism, functional connectivity and cognitive scores.ResultWe found inconclusive to moderate evidence in favor of no effect of carrier status on basal forebrain (BF10 = 0.884) and hippocampal volumes (BF10 = 0.964) or metabolism (BF10 = 0.187) (see Figure) in preclinical (CDR = 0) and prodromal (CDR = 0.5) subjects. However, we found extreme evidence that delayed memory was decreased already in preclinical mutation carriers (BF10 = 4066.73). Yet, we found no conclusive evidence that this subtle memory impairment was associated with basal forebrain (BF10 = 0.582) or hippocampal (BF10 = 0.906) atrophy.ConclusionOur findings indicate absence of basal forebrain and hippocampus atrophy or metabolic impairment in preclinical mutation carriers. Interestingly, memory impairment was already present in preclinical mutation carriers. This is consistent with results of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) cohort showing early cognitive impairment in mutation carriers, but no significant group differences in hippocampal volume until later stages of the disease. These previous and our findings may suggest that different brain regions and networks are affected in preclinical stages of familial AD than in preclinical sporadic AD, which should be investigated in future studies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call