Abstract

The article discusses functional and semantic status of Future Tense grammatical markers of the Korean language. Despite the fact that discussions on this issue have been going on for more than a dozen years, still among researchers, there is no consensus on how many grammemes make up the category of Tense in Korean, whether it contains an independent Future Tense grammeme, and if so, which markers should be relevant to it. Due to the relevance of the problem, the authors aim to give a brief overview of the opinions on the issue, dividing them into two groups - asserting the presence of the Future Tense grammeme in Korean or denying it, as well as to justify personal position on the status of grammatical markers with prospective semantics. As research material, various Korean grammar researches and Korean grammar (connective and finite endings and constructions with - (으)ㄹ Korean Future Tense participle marker) are used. The result of the study shows that Korean Tense category has no specific Future Tense forms as opposed to the Present and Past Tense forms. All markers with prospective semantics are modal, which means that the Futurum category in Korean implements itself in the functional and semantic field of modality rather than temporality. Authors argue statement that -(으)ㄹ 것이다 Korean construction has the ability to act as neutral non-modal Future Tense marker. According to the point of view of a systemically oriented approach to the grammatical units analysis, presented in the article, the conclusion about Korean -(으)ㄹ 것이다s modal status is made.

Highlights

  • Настоящая статья посвящена рассмотрению проблемы функционально-семантического статуса грамматических показателей будущего времени в корейском языке

  • Due to the relevance of the problem, the authors aim to give a brief overview of the opinions on the issue, dividing them into two groups — asserting the presence of the Future Tense grammeme in Korean or denying it, as well as to justify personal position on the status of grammatical markers with prospective semantics

  • All markers with prospective semantics are modal, which means that the Futurum category in Korean implements itself in the functional and semantic field of modality rather than temporality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Настоящая статья посвящена рассмотрению проблемы функционально-семантического статуса грамматических показателей будущего времени в корейском языке. Modern Korean studies more and more often observe the point of view on the Korean language deficiency of the independent Future Tense category because speaking about the future a Korean speaker means not real, but possible, probable future using the suffix to express intention, readiness or promise, depending on the context, to make the action mentioned, but not the future itself [2; 5; 12; 13; 17; 18].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call