Functional and Pharmacological Effects of Ureteral Diversion

Abstract

Urinary diversion is the final therapeutic approach in several bladder pathologies including selected cases of bladder cancer, neurogenic bladder, and painful bladder syndrome. While there have been a few experimental studies on the effects of urinary diversion and subsequent undiversion on bladder capacity, the pharmacological changes occurring with diversion and undiversion have not yet been investigated. Our primary objectives were to determine the functional and pharmacological alterations in the defunctionalized bladder and the effects of refunctionalization on these changes. Thirty-two male adult canines weighing 15 to 20lb. were used for this study. Three groups of dogs were urine diverted for one, three, and six month durations (four dogs per group). Another three groups of dogs were urine diverted for one, three, and six months (four dogs per group); these dogs were then undiverted for three months. Six control animals received either one or two sham operations at one, three, and six months.In all groups the functional and contractile characteristics of the bladders were assessed by urodynamics and in vitro contractile studies; bladder weight and muscarinic receptor density were also measured. Intravesical capacities determined by in vivo cystometry were reduced significantly to 74%, 63%, and 47% of control values at one, three, and six months respectively after urinary diversion. Bladder capacity returned to above normal levels in bladders diverted and then subsequently undiverted. Similarly, the compliance and bladder weight of the diverted bladders were significantly less than control, while diverted bladders subsequently undiverted were similar to controls. Maximal bladder contractility in response to bethanechol stimulation was less in diverted bladders compared to control. This decrease in contractility was accompanied by a decrease in muscarinic receptor density. After undiversion maximal bladder contractility to bethanechol reached control levels; this was accompanied by a parallel increase in muscarinic receptor density to control values. There was no effect of diversion or undiversion on the maximal response of bladder strips to methoxamine stimulation. Thus, a bladder that has been diverted (defunctionalized) for a period of time showed decreases in capacity, compliance, and contractility to muscarinic stimulation along with a decrease in muscarinic receptor density. All of these parameters were restored after refunctionalization of the bladder.