Abstract
The rat whisker system connects the tactile environment with the somatosensory thalamocortical system using only two synaptic stages. Encoding properties of the first stage, the primary afferents with somas in the trigeminal ganglion (TG), has been well studied, whereas much less is known from the second stage, the brainstem trigeminal nuclei (TN). The TN are a computational hub giving rise to parallel ascending tactile pathways and receiving feedback from many brain sites. We asked the question, whether encoding properties of TG neurons are kept by two trigeminal nuclei, the principalis (Pr5) and the spinalis interpolaris (Sp5i), respectively giving rise to two "lemniscal" and two "nonlemniscal" pathways. Single units were recorded in anesthetized rats while a single whisker was deflected on a band-limited white noise trajectory. Using information theoretic methods and spike-triggered mixture models (STM), we found that both nuclei encode the stimulus locally in time, i.e., stimulus features more than 10 ms in the past do not significantly influence spike generation. They further encode stimulus kinematics in multiple, distinct response fields, indicating encoding characteristics beyond previously described directional responses. Compared with TG, Pr5 and Sp5i gave rise to lower spike and information rates, but information rate per spike was on par with TG. Importantly, both brainstem nuclei were found to largely keep encoding properties of primary afferents, i.e. local encoding and kinematic response fields. The preservation of encoding properties in channels assumed to serve different functions seems surprising. We discuss the possibility that it might reflect specific constraints of frictional whisker contact with object surfaces.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We studied two trigeminal nuclei containing the second neuron on the tactile pathway of whisker-related tactile information in rats. We found that the subnuclei, traditionally assumed to give rise to functional tactile channels, nevertheless transfer primary afferent information with quite similar properties in terms of integration time and kinematic profile. We discuss whether such commonality may be due the requirement to adapt to physical constraints of frictional whisker contact.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.