Abstract

Funayama’s theorem states that there is an embedding e of a lattice L into a complete Boolean algebra B such that e preserves all existing joins and meets in L iff L satisfies the join infinite distributive law (JID) and the meet infinite distributive law (MID). More generally, there is a lattice embedding e: L → B preserving all existing joins in L iff L satisfies (JID), and there is a lattice embedding e: L → B preserving all existing meets in L iff L satisfies (MID). Funayama’s original proof is quite involved. There are two more accessible proofs in case L is complete. One was given by Gratzer by means of free Boolean extensions and MacNeille completions, and the other by Johnstone by means of nuclei and Booleanization. We show that Gratzer’s proof has an obvious generalization to the non-complete case, and that in the complete case the complete Boolean algebras produced by Gratzer and Johnstone are isomorphic. We prove that in the non-complete case, the class of lattices satisfying (JID) properly contains the class of Heyting algebras, and we characterize lattices satisfying (JID) and (MID) by means of their Priestley duals. Utilizing duality theory, we give alternative proofs of Funayama’s theorem and of the isomorphism between the complete Boolean algebras produced by Gratzer and Johnstone. We also show that unlike Gratzer’s proof, there is no obvious way to generalize Johnstone’s proof to the non-complete case.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.