Abstract

BackgroundIncreasing numbers of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and limited follow-up capacities highlight unmet challenges in clinical electrophysiology. Integrated software (MediConnect®) enabling fully digital processing of device interrogation data has been commercially developed to facilitate follow-up visits. We sought to assess feasibility of fully digital data processing (FDDP) during ambulatory device follow-up in a high-volume tertiary hospital to provide guidance for future users of FDDP software.MethodsA total of 391 patients (mean age, 70 years) presenting to the outpatient department for routine device follow-up were analyzed (pacemaker, 44%; implantable cardioverter defibrillator, 39%; cardiac resynchronization therapy device, 16%).ResultsQuality of data transfer and follow-up duration were compared between digital (n = 265) and manual processing of device data (n = 126). Digital data import was successful, complete and correct in 82% of cases when early software versions were used. When using the most recent software version the rate of successful digital data import increased to 100%. Software-based import of interrogation data was complete and without failure in 97% of cases. The mean duration of a follow-up visit did not differ between the two groups (digital 18.7 min vs. manual data transfer 18.2 min).ConclusionsFDDP software was successfully implemented into the ambulatory follow-up of patients with implanted pacemakers and defibrillators. Digital data import into electronic patient management software was feasible and supported the physician’s workflow. The total duration of follow-up visits comprising technical device interrogation and clinical actions was not affected in the present tertiary center outpatient cohort.

Highlights

  • Increasing numbers of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and limited follow-up capacities highlight unmet challenges in clinical electrophysiology

  • Patient characteristics A total of 391 patients presenting for ambulatory followup of cardiac pacemakers (n = 173; 44%), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) (n = 154; 39%), or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices (n = 64; 16%) were included (Tables 1 and 2)

  • Manual transfer of device interrogation data was employed in 126 cases (32%), whereas fully digital data processing (FDDP) using M­ ediConnect® software was used in 265 patients (68%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Increasing numbers of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and limited follow-up capacities highlight unmet challenges in clinical electrophysiology. Integrated software (­MediConnect®) enabling fully digital processing of device interrogation data has been commercially developed to facilitate follow-up visits. During conventional follow-up visits, device data obtained through the programmer are transferred manually into paper-based patient records or electronic patient management systems and device identification documents. To optimize quality and duration of CIED follow-up visits, an integrated software package ­(MediConnect®) has been developed, enabling digital processing of device follow-up data. Digital transfer of interrogation data between the programmer and electronic patient management systems is expected to result in increased efficiency with concurrent improvement in reporting quality. The normalization results in a uniform follow-up process for different devices and manufacturers which may improve workflow productivity

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.