Abstract

Antinuclear antibody-negative full-house lupus nephritis though previously reported, is fairly uncommon. Some patients go on to develop antibodies later in the disease course. The presence of RO-52 antibody in this case suggests an underlying immunological cause. Swift management based on strong clinical suspicion can be life-saving to the patient. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a serious complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is more likely to progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). With the recent EULAR/ACR criteria mandating antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity as an entry criterion, clinicians are faced with a diagnostic dilemma in diagnosing cases of seronegative SLE. We present the case of a 25-year-old female who presented with photosensitive malar rash, hair loss, oral ulcers, menorrhagia, and kidney dysfunction, suggestive of SLE. Her ANA tests were negative, raising doubts about the diagnosis. Biopsy was delayed owing to anemia and thrombocytopenia, and clinical judgment led to the patient being diagnosed with LN, with prompt treatment resulting in significant improvement. Renal biopsy subsequently confirmed the case as diffuse class IV LN with full-house nephropathy. This case highlights the limitations of relying solely on ANA positivity in diagnosing LN and underscores the need for a comprehensive diagnostic approach for SLE that incorporates clinical features, immunological markers, and patient demographics. ANA-negative SLE patients demand heightened clinical suspicion, especially when other diagnostic parameters align with the disease. Swift intervention with immunosuppressive therapy, as seen in this case, can be life-saving.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.