Full-Thickness Grafting of Acute Eyelid Burns Should Not Be Considered Taboo

Abstract

Split-thickness skin grafts are commonly used for the treatment of acute eyelid burns; in fact, this is dogma for the upper lid. Ectropion, corneal exposure, and repeated grafting are common sequelae, almost the rule. It was hypothesized that for acute eyelid burns, the use of full-thickness skin grafts, which contract less than split-thickness skin grafts, would result in a lower incidence of ectropion with less corneal exposure and fewer recurrences. The records of all patients (n = 18) who undenvent primary skin grafting of acutely burned eyelids (n = 50) between 1985 and 1995 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 10 patients who received full-thickness skin grafts (12 upper lids, 8 lower lids) and 8 patients who received split-thickness skin grafts (15 upper lids, 15 lower lids). Three of 10 patients (30 percent) who received full-thickness skin grafts and 7 of 8 patients (88 percent) who received split-thickness skin grafts developed ectropion and required reconstruction of the lids (p = 0.02). No articles were found substantiating the concept that only split-thickness grafts be used for acute eyelid burns. The treatment of acute eyelid burns with full-thickness rather than split-thickness skin grafts results in less ectropion and fewer reconstructive procedures. It should no longer be considered taboo and should be carried out whenever possible and appropriate.