Abstract

Profusive cracking leading to the deterioration of prestressed concrete sleepers has retained the sleepers from being exploited to their full extent. In addition, excess utilization of cement in producing the same has paved the way for developing its counterpart, geopolymer concrete (GPC), involving primary industrial residues as their precursors. This study presents a comprehensive investigation into the development and performance of high-strength geopolymer concrete sleepers for railway applications. The research focuses on the complete replacement of ordinary Portland cement with Fly ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag in the geopolymer concrete mix, for mainline prestressed railway sleepers following Indian Railway Standards (IRS). Notably, the study includes experimental validations of long steel fibers as secondary reinforcement to the primary prestressing strands, aiming to enhance the ductility of the member. Experimental validations were performed on full-scale (1:1) sleeper members under static loading conditions. The main aim of this article was to assess the load carrying capacity at cracking and ultimate limits, rail seat bending moment, ductility indices, failure mechanism, electrical impedance, bond strength, and the eco-efficiency for the proposed prestressed geopolymer concrete sleeper members (with and without steel fibres) with reference to the conventional prestressed cement concrete sleepers. The considered GPC mix was found to achieve higher load and moment carrying capacity by about 8.3% and 8.54% respectively compared to the conventional concrete mix. The addition of steel fibres in the GPC increased the load and moment capacity of sleepers by 23% and 24.21% respectively. Additionally, the steel fibre reinforced GPC showed improved displacement ductility demand over the plain geopolymer concrete averaging 25%, 28.5%, and 3% corresponding to ultimate, failure, and residual ductility index respectively. Though inclusion of steel fibers improves the performance of sleepers in terms of load and ductility, they were found incompatible with regard to the electrical impedance property when used in conjunction with the pre-stressing strands.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call