Abstract

Nanoscale pore structure characteristics and their main controlling factors are key elements affecting the gas storage capacity, permeability, and the accumulation mechanism of shale. A multidisciplinary analytical program was applied to quantify the pore structure of all sizes of Xiamaling shale from Zhangjiakou, Hebei. The result implies that Mercury injection porosimetry (MIP) and low-pressure N2 curves of the samples can be divided into three and four types, respectively, reflecting different connectivity performances. The maximum CO2 adsorbing capacity increases with increasing total organic carbon (TOC) content, pore volume (PV), and surface area (SA) of the micropores are distributed in a three-peak type. The full-scale pore structure distribution characteristics reveal the coexistence of multiple peaks with multiple dominant scales and bi-peak forms with mesopores and micropores. The porosity positively correlates with the TOC and quartz content, but negatively correlates with clay mineral content. Organic matter (OM) is the main contributor to micropore and mesopore development. Smectite and illite/smectite (I/S) assist the development of the PV and SA of pores with different size. Illite promotes the development of the nanoscale PV, but is detrimental to the development of the SA. Thermal maturity controls the evolution of pores with different size, and the evolution model for the TOC-normalized PVs of different diameter scales is established. Residual hydrocarbon is mainly accumulated in micropores sized 0.3 to 1.0 nm and mesopores sized 40 nm, 2 nm and less than 10 nm. Since the samples were extracted, the pore space occupied by residual hydrocarbon was released, resulting in a remarkable increase in PV and SA.

Highlights

  • Shale gas is mainly adsorbed on the surface of mineral particles or organic matter (OM), or is stored in a free state in nanoscale pores or a dissolved state in kerogen and bitumen [1,2,3,4]

  • The total organic carbon (TOC) content of the Xiamaling shale varies from 0.55% to 7.60%, with an average value of 3.10%, and the equivalent vitrinite reflectance ranges between 0.52% and 1.88%, indicating that the shale is a “good” source rock and is in the low- and high-maturation stages

  • The TOC content of 18 shale samples exhibits a weak correlation with the quartz content (R2 = 0.32, Figure 7a), which is observed in Longmaxi shale from the Sichuan

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Shale gas is mainly adsorbed on the surface of mineral particles or organic matter (OM), or is stored in a free state in nanoscale pores or a dissolved state in kerogen and bitumen [1,2,3,4]. The qualitative methods include computerized tomography (CT) scanning, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), broad-ion beam SEM (BIB-SEM), and focused ion beam polishing in combination with SEM (FIB-SEM) [7,8,9,10,11] These qualitative image observation technologies have previously been widely applied to observe pore sizes and distributions and the geometry and connectivity of pore networks. Image-based visible nanoscale pore information can be extracted via point counting in Image J software (V1.8.0.112, 22 July 2019) [12,13] Quantitative methods, such as small angle and ultra-small angle neutron scattering, gas adsorption (CH4 , CO2 , N2 ), and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), have been used to measure pore structure parameters at nm-scale resolution. This study provides important evidence for understanding and evaluating the desorption, diffusion, seepage, migration, and later exploitation of shale gas in different occurrence states

Geological Setting
Samples and Experiments
Mercury Injection Porosimetry
Residual Hydrocarbon Extraction
Low-Pressure N2 and CO2 Adsorption
Determination of Total Porosity
Basic Organic Geochemistry and Mineralogy
Pore Characterization Based on MIP
Mercury
Relationship between TOC and Quartz and Clay Minerals
Control on Pore Structure
Effect of TOCinvestigated
Effect of Maturation on Pore Evolution
14. Thermal
Adsorption Desorption Curve Characteristics
Variation Characteristics of the Micropore Structures
22. Relationships between theEOM
25. Mesopore
26. Relationships between
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call