Abstract

In Commissioner of Taxation v. Glencore Investment Pty Ltd, the Full Federal Court has comprehensively reviewed Australia’s transfer pricing rules and dismissed the Commissioner’s appeal against the decision at first instance – where Davies J held that prices charged by the taxpayer to its Swiss parent, for the sale of copper concentrate, were “arm’s length”. The Full Court’s judgments include (i) a detailed discussion of the difficulties involved in predicting how independent parties, dealing at arm’s length, would price wholly controlled transactions; (ii) an acknowledgement of the practical issues facing taxpayers and the Commissioner alike, in demonstrating whether prices are, or are not, arm’s length; and (iii) a welcome endorsement of the need to use common sense in assessing transfer pricing outcomes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.