Abstract

BackgroundThe clinical outcome of full arch fixed prostheses vs. full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses supported by implants and natural tooth abutments in periodontally treated patients has been reported by few studies, with controversial results. The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term (15 years) complications of abutment teeth and dental implants in periodontally treated patients, rehabilitated with full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses (TRP)s vs. full arch fixed prostheses (FP)s supported by teeth and implants.Material and MethodsAfter active periodontal therapy (non-surgical and surgical), and implant placement (replacement of hopeless teeth and in edentulous sites), 18 patients were rehabilitated in both dental arches with full arch TRPs, and 17 patients were rehabilitated with full arch FPs. Patients were annually recalled for technical and/or biological complications monitoring.ResultsDuring the 15-year observation period, 29 of 164 (17.6%) implants failed in the TRP group and 26 of 152 (17.1 %) implants in the FP group. Due to progression of periodontal disease, endo-perio untreatable lesion and caries, 22 of 233 abutment teeth were extracted (8.1) % in the TRP group and 23 of 221 (10.4%) abutment teeth were extracted in the FP group. Difference in implant failures and abutment teeth loss between the two groups were found not statistically significant (p >0.05). Poisson regression analysis showed that in both groups, factors such as smoking habits, FMBS>20, number of pockets >6 mm, mean bone loss, and bone loss/age, contribute to tooth and implant failure (p<0.05).ConclusionsIn this clinical study, in periodontally treated patients, full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses, and full arch fixed prosthesis, supported by teeth and implants presented comparable long-term results of tooth loss and implant failure, if regular periodontal therapy is implemented. Key words:Periodontal disease, implants, tooth-implant connection, telescopic prosthesis, fixed prosthesis.

Highlights

  • Dentitions, damaged by severe periodontal disease, need comprehensive treatment plans encompassing non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapies, as well as prosthetic rehabilitation, to restore health, function and aesthetics [1,2,3]

  • The second objective is to compare outcomes of full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prosthesis (TRP) and full arch fixed prosthesis (FP), both supported by teeth-implants, used to rehabilitate periodontally compromised dentitions after active periodontal therapy (ATP)

  • Material and Methods This prospective clinical study comprised periodontally compromised patients treated and maintained with supportive periodontal therapy (SPT), who received full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses (TRP) or full arch fixed prostheses (FP), both supported by teeth-implants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dentitions, damaged by severe periodontal disease, need comprehensive treatment plans encompassing non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapies, as well as prosthetic rehabilitation, to restore health, function and aesthetics [1,2,3]. The second objective is to compare outcomes of full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prosthesis (TRP) and full arch fixed prosthesis (FP), both supported by teeth-implants, used to rehabilitate periodontally compromised dentitions after active periodontal therapy (ATP). The clinical outcome of full arch fixed prostheses vs full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses supported by implants and natural tooth abutments in periodontally treated patients has been reported by few studies, with controversial results. The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term (15 years) complications of abutment teeth and dental implants in periodontally treated patients, rehabilitated with full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses (TRP)s vs full arch fixed prostheses (FP)s supported by teeth and implants. Conclusion: In this clinical study, in periodontally treated patients, full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses, and full arch fixed prosthesis, supported by teeth and implants presented comparable long-term results of tooth loss and implant failure, if regular periodontal therapy is implemented

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call