Abstract

Accumulation of dead woody material is a critical management concern following wildfires, especially given the possibility of subsequent wildfires. Forest structure and fuel accumulation are largely driven by site climatic conditions, so variability in site conditions is important to consider in management beyond the one-size fits all model for post-fire fuel dynamics. Moreover, dead woody material provides important ecological functions for forested ecosystems. Understanding when surface fuels biomass is highest following wildfires and how these dynamics change after repeated fires affords land management agencies opportunities to adjust fuel reduction strategies without removing large quantities of dead trees that are important in these post-fire landscapes for a variety of ecosystem services, including wildlife, water and nutrient retention, and soil stabilization. Here, we examined how surface fuels and standing dead trees change over time, by burn severity, site climate, and with repeated fires at seven different years since- fire (1-24 years) across 182 sites from ten wildfires in central Idaho. Downed woody fuel loads were higher on moister and cooler sites. Large-diameter woody fuels saw significant increases after about 14 years post-fire while smaller woody fuels had the highest loads at 20 years post-fire. Surface fuel loads varied by burn severity and years since fires, with the highest loadings at longer years since fire and sites burned in stand replacing fire. Litter and duff had not sufficiently accumulated to compensate for continued decomposition, resulting in lower forest floor biomass through 24 years post fire. Density of snags of all sizes generally declined after 7-9 years, but large diameter snags were still standing 24 years post fire. Repeated fires resulted in >40% reduction in both surface fuels and standing trees compared to once-burned areas at the same years since fire. Burned landscapes can serve a great ecological benefit by providing an infusion of both standing and downed dead woody debris. Additionally, though some sites burned in stand replacing fires exceed recommended surface fuel loadings, these ecological considerations should be weighed against concerns about reburning potential and fire fighter hazards.

Highlights

  • The increasing footprint of wildfires across the western U.S (Moritz et al, 2012; Stephens et al, 2013; Parks et al, 2016) has raised concerns about surface fuel accumulation on postfire landscapes

  • Total Downed woody debris (DWD), coarse woody debris (CWD), and fine woody debris (FWD) each had a strong positive relationship with years since fire (Figure 3 and Table 3). The biomass of these three woody fuel classes trended toward a significant correlation with differenced normalized burn ratio (dNBR)

  • The strongest climate metrics varied slightly by fuel category, but all three had summer precipitation balance as a significant positive predictor. Significant across these three surface woody fuel variables was some metric of extreme climate conditions, with all three variables having a negative relationship to the maximum temperature on the hottest month

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The increasing footprint of wildfires across the western U.S (Moritz et al, 2012; Stephens et al, 2013; Parks et al, 2016) has raised concerns about surface fuel accumulation on postfire landscapes. Woody fuel accumulation in burned landscapes following large wildfires is a dominant concern when considering how these sites will burn in the event of a subsequent fire, including both the ecological effects and fire suppression issues that may arise. A primary concern of U.S land management agencies related to reburning is the potential for increased “resistance to control” or a compromised ability for fire crews to build fire lines due primarily to increased surface fuel loading (USDA et al, 1976; Alexander, 2000). Little is known about long-term woody fuel dynamics and accumulation in forests across a range of climatic regimes and the impact of repeated wildfires in quick succession

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call