Abstract

The chloroplast division machinery is a mixture of a stromal FtsZ-based complex descended from a cyanobacterial ancestor of chloroplasts and a cytosolic dynamin-related protein (DRP) 5B-based complex derived from the eukaryotic host. Molecular genetic studies have shown that each component of the division machinery is normally essential for normal chloroplast division. However, several exceptions have been found. In the absence of the FtsZ ring, non-photosynthetic plastids are able to proliferate, likely by elongation and budding. Depletion of DRP5B impairs, but does not stop chloroplast division. Chloroplasts in glaucophytes, which possesses a peptidoglycan (PG) layer, divide without DRP5B. Certain parasitic eukaryotes possess non-photosynthetic plastids of secondary endosymbiotic origin, but neither FtsZ nor DRP5B is encoded in their genomes. Elucidation of the FtsZ- and/or DRP5B-less chloroplast division mechanism will lead to a better understanding of the function and evolution of the chloroplast division machinery and the finding of the as-yet-unknown mechanism that is likely involved in chloroplast division. Recent studies have shown that FtsZ was lost from a variety of prokaryotes, many of which lost PG by regressive evolution. In addition, even some of the FtsZ-bearing bacteria are able to divide when FtsZ and PG are depleted experimentally. In some cases, alternative mechanisms for cell division, such as budding by an increase of the cell surface-to-volume ratio, are proposed. Although PG is believed to have been lost from chloroplasts other than in glaucophytes, there is some indirect evidence for the existence of PG in chloroplasts. Such information is also useful for understanding how non-photosynthetic plastids are able to divide in FtsZ-depleted cells and the reason for the retention of FtsZ in chloroplast division. Here we summarize information to facilitate analyses of FtsZ- and/or DRP5B-less chloroplast and non-photosynthetic plastid division.

Highlights

  • Mitochondria and chloroplasts arose as a consequence of a series of endosymbiotic events more than one billion years ago

  • The chloroplast division machinery is a chimeric protein complex based on stromal FtsZ of cyanobacterial origin and cytosolic DRP5B of eukaryotic host origin

  • There are exceptions, in which chloroplast and/or non-photosynthetic plastids are able to divide in FtsZ or DRP5B knockout cells, or in which the genomes of chloroplasts or non-photosynthetic plastid-bearing eukaryotes do not encode FtsZ and/or DRP5B

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Mitochondria and chloroplasts (including non-photosynthetic plastids in land plants and parasitic protists) arose as a consequence of a series of endosymbiotic events more than one billion years ago. Increased lipid synthesis by the overexpression of Acetyl-CoA carboxylase enabled wild-type protoplasts to multiply in a manner similar to the L-form (Mercier et al, 2013) These observations raise the possibility that cell division in wall-deficient cells, including ancestral prokaryotic cells, does not require elaborate cell division machinery at the division site and instead occurs spontaneously by an increase of the cell surface to volume ratio resulting from an acceleration of cytoplasmic membrane growth or a reduction of cell volume by evaporation (Koonin and Mulkidjanian, 2013; Mercier et al, 2013). This situation is similar to “traction-mediated cytokinesis” or “cytokinesis B” in the eukaryotic slime mold

Hodgkinia cicadicola
Toxoplasma gondii
CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call