Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explain the reason for the FSA's largest‐ever fine on an individual, for the FSA's continued emphasis on credible deterrence, and the likelihood of significant fines as a matter of course.Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes Simon Eagle's role in a share ramping scheme, the FSA's findings in the Eagle case, and the upward trend in penalties imposed by the FSA in recent years.FindingsThe regulator has shown that it does not shy away from levying swingeing fines on individuals as well as firms, particularly in the case of those deemed not to have co‐operated.Practical implicationsIn light of these developments, both individuals and firms should pay heed to the potentially heavy consequences they face should they fall foul of the rules.Originality/valueThe paper provides practical guidance from experienced securities lawyers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
