Abstract

We argue that the analogue in collisionless plasma of the collisional diffusion region of magnetic reconnection is properly defined in terms of the demagnetization of the plasma electrons that enable “frozen flux” slippage to occur. This condition differs from the violation of the “frozen-in” condition, which only implies that two fluid effects are involved, rather than the necessary slippage of magnetic flux as viewed in the electron frame. Using 2D Particle In Cell (PIC) simulations, this approach properly finds the saddle point region of the flux function. Our demagnetization conditions are the dimensionless guiding center approximation expansion parameters for electrons which we show are observable and determined locally by the ratio of non-ideal electric to magnetic field strengths. Proxies for frozen flux slippage are developed that (a) are measurable on a single spacecraft, (b) are dimensionless with theoretically justified threshold values of significance, and (c) are shown in 2D simulations to recover distinctions theoretically possible with the (unmeasurable) flux function. A new potentially observable dimensionless frozen flux rate, ΛΦ, differentiates significant from anecdotal frozen flux slippage. A single spacecraft observable, ϒ, is shown with PIC simulations to be essentially proportional to the unobservable local Maxwell frozen flux rate. This relationship theoretically establishes electron demagnetization in 3D as the general cause of frozen flux slippage. In simple 2D cases with an isolated central diffusion region surrounded by separatrices, these diagnostics uniquely identify the traditional diffusion region (without confusing it with the two fluid “ion-diffusion” region) and clarify the role of the separatrices where frozen flux violations do occur but are not substantial. In the more complicated guide and asymmetric 2D cases, substantial flux slippage regions extend out along, but inside of, the preferred separatrices, demonstrating that ΛΦ ≠ 0 violations are present over significant distances (in ion inertial units) from the separator identified by the 2D flux function; these violations are, however, generally weaker than seen at known separators in 2D simulations.

Highlights

  • We argue that the analogue in collisionless plasma of the collisional diffusion region of magnetic reconnection is properly defined in terms of the demagnetization of the plasma electrons that enable “frozen flux” slippage to occur

  • This paper addresses the diagnosis of plasma and field signatures at possible space plasma sites of collisionless magnetic reconnection when flux functions, vector potentials, r  Ek, and Jk are not experimentally available during the spacecraft’s transit time of anticipated electron inertial scaled current channels

  • This regime is the general circumstance for NASA’s present space plasma experiments, including those recently launched on the Magnetospheric Multi-Scale (MMS) mission focused on the physics of collisionless magnetic reconnection

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This paper addresses the diagnosis of plasma and field signatures at possible space plasma sites of collisionless magnetic reconnection when flux functions, vector potentials, r  Ek, and Jk are not experimentally available during the spacecraft’s transit time of anticipated electron inertial scaled current channels. Our proxy analysis in this paper determines all of these expansion parameters from PIC simulations of magnetic reconnection, demonstrating that these quantities are nonuniformly enhanced within the reconnection current channel whose locations are established with the flux functions that exist for these 2D simulations These signatures are shown to be non-perturbative in the PIC layers that form self consistently and represent observable proxies for demagnetization and frozen-flux violations.

CONCEPTS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF RECONNECTION
NEW TOOLS FOR DIAGNOSING RECONNECTION IN 3D
Time scales for flux slippage vs fluid motion
Electrons demagnetization and corollaries
Relationships of de and e
Correlative signatures of electron demagnetization
Electron thermal Mach number
Space charge density
Proxies vs Maxwell vs flux function in 2D
Scales along width and breadth of the symmetric reconnection
Overview
Details of the frozen flux violating layers in guide geometry
Findings
Demagnetization with increasing guide field strength
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.