Abstract

Spatially and temporally congruent visuotactile stimulation of a fake hand together with one’s real hand may result in an illusory self-attribution of the fake hand. Although this illusion relies on a representation of the two touched body parts in external space, there is tentative evidence that, for the illusion to occur, the seen and felt touches also need to be congruent in an anatomical reference frame. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a somatotopical, virtual reality-based setup to isolate the neuronal basis of such a comparison. Participants’ index or little finger was synchronously touched with the index or little finger of a virtual hand, under congruent or incongruent orientations of the real and virtual hands. The left ventral premotor cortex responded significantly more strongly to visuotactile co-stimulation of the same versus different fingers of the virtual and real hand. Conversely, the left anterior intraparietal sulcus responded significantly more strongly to co-stimulation of different versus same fingers. Both responses were independent of hand orientation congruence and of spatial congruence of the visuotactile stimuli. Our results suggest that fronto-parietal areas previously associated with multisensory processing within peripersonal space and with tactile remapping evaluate the congruence of visuotactile stimulation on the body according to an anatomical reference frame.

Highlights

  • When I see a body being touched and at the same time feel touch on the corresponding part of my skin, I know immediately that it is my body that I see being touched

  • The rubber hand illusion (RHI) only occurs if prior constraints of a Correlates of Anatomically Congruent Touch pre-existing body model and basic rules of multisensory integration are satisfied—i.e., if the seen and felt touch occurs at the same time and at a corresponding location (Meredith and Stein, 1986; Makin et al, 2008; Tsakiris, 2010; Blanke, 2012; Ehrsson, 2012)

  • FMRI revealed that the left PMv responded significantly more strongly when the touch was seen on the same finger of the virtual hand as it was felt on the real hand

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When I see a body being touched and at the same time feel touch on the corresponding part of my skin, I know immediately that it is my body that I see being touched. Multisensory integration and the underlying causal inference are probabilistic, and inherently flexible This is the case for seen and felt touch, as demonstrated by the rubber hand illusion (RHI): when participants see a fake hand being touched and simultaneously feel a touch on the corresponding location of their real hand, they often report “feeling” the touch on the fake hand (Botvinick and Cohen, 1998). The RHI only occurs if prior constraints of a Correlates of Anatomically Congruent Touch pre-existing body model (an anatomically plausible shape and position of the fake hand) and basic rules of multisensory integration are satisfied—i.e., if the seen and felt touch occurs at the same time and at a corresponding location (Meredith and Stein, 1986; Makin et al, 2008; Tsakiris, 2010; Blanke, 2012; Ehrsson, 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call