Abstract
River regulation alters the natural flow regime of streams with consequent impacts on terrestrial and aquatic habitats of the riparian zone. The severity of such impacts can be modulated by changing the redistribution rules at water intakes and reservoirs. Contrary to minimal-flow policies, non-proportional and proportional redistribution policies result in variable environmental flow releases, namely Dynamic Environmental Flows (DEFs), which improve the global (i.e., ecological and economic) efficiency of water use practice, e.g., for energy production. DEF assessment is based on different indicators. However, the choice and aggregation method of different hydrological and fish habitat indicators affects the assessment of the global power plant performance, i.e., the Frontier of efficient solutions (sensu Pareto). This study investigates DEF assessment, and shows the extent to which the choice and method of aggregation of different indicators impacts the Frontier of Pareto-efficient solutions. The findings are supported by six case studies of hydropower practice that differ in terms of river morphology, energy production amount and technique. The relative importance of several types of indicators is examined as is their influence on optimal and sustainable water allocation solutions that lie on the Pareto Frontier. The analysis shows that DEFs arising from either proportional or non-proportional redistribution rules can positively impact strategies of sustainable management of freshwater resources.
Highlights
Energy from renewable sources has gradually grown over recent decades in order to promote the transition towards green forms of production and so mitigate global warming
Environmental flows correspond to a static redistribution rule determining a constant flow release (Minimal Flow Requirement, MFR, or Residual Flow), which is determined from the flow duration curve of the natural flow regime
This study shows that for Small Hydropower Plant (SHP), only few among all indicators of hydrological alteration are relevant to evaluate the performance of the adopted redistribution rules as far as its hydrological similarities with the natural flow regime are concerned
Summary
Energy from renewable sources has gradually grown over recent decades in order to promote the transition towards green forms of production and so mitigate global warming. Environmental flows correspond to a static redistribution rule determining a constant flow release (Minimal Flow Requirement, MFR, or Residual Flow), which is determined from the flow duration curve of the natural flow regime. Some countries currently apply proportional policies (PP) as redistribution rules, which better mimic stream natural variability. These rules are included in the environmental law of Scotland and England (Environment Agency, 2013; SEPA, 2014; Willmott et al, 2016) and represent a substantial improvement compared to the static MFR rules that are still used in many European countries (Basso and Botter, 2012; Gorla and Perona, 2013; Lazzaro et al, 2013; Perona et al, 2013; Razurel et al, 2018)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
