Frontal Sinus Osteoma: From Direct Excision to Endoscopic Removal.

Abstract

Frontal sinus osteomas are benign bone-forming neoplasms. Ongoing advancements in endoscopic surgery have allowed less invasive surgical approaches to be adopted for removal. The authors systematically reviewed the literature to provide analysis and recommendations for management.One hundred ninety-three publications encompassing 1399 patients met inclusion, with mean age 42.1 ± 13.8 years and a male predominance (59.2%). Symptoms included pain (70.8%); orbital/ocular (20.7%); sinonasal (36.4%); neurologic (6.0%); other (14.5%); and asymptomatic (4.8%). Osteoma was isolated to the frontal sinus (82.9%) or extended into the ethmoid (16.6%), maxillary (0.3%), and sphenoid sinuses (0.2%). There was intracranial extension in 9.5% and intraorbital extension in 18.7%. Of those proceeding to surgery, majority (59.8%) underwent open approaches, followed by endoscopic (25.0%) and combined (11.5%). A significant (P < 0.01) increase in proportion of cases utilizing endoscopic approaches versus open/combined was observed over the period studied. Seventy-one postoperative complications were reported, in 7.5% of endoscopic cases, 27% of open, and 8.8% of combined. Complications were more likely in open/combined surgery, compared with endoscopic (22.3% versus 7.5%, P < 0.001). In 181 patients, completeness of resection was reported (complete resection; 87.8%) and found to be a significant predictor (P < 0.01) for disease recurrence/progression. Mean length of stay for the endoscopic group was 3.1 ± 1.3 days, compared with 7.9 ± 3.1 for open/combined (P < 0.0001).In the management of frontal sinus osteoma, indications for selecting endoscopic versus open approaches have expanded over the past 30 years, as techniques, equipment, and understanding of pathophysiology have evolved. Where endoscopic approaches are possible, they are associated with reduced morbidity and length of stay compared with open approaches.