Abstract
Uncertain inference is a probabilistic generalisation of the logical view on databases, ranking documents according to their probabilities that they logically imply the query. For tasks other than ad-hoc retrieval, estimates of the actual probability of relevance are required. In this paper, we investigate mapping functions between these two types of probability. For this purpose, we consider linear and logistic functions. The former have been proposed before, whereas we give a new theoretic justification for the latter. In a series of upper-bound experiments, we compare the goodness of fit of the two models. A second series of experiments investigates the effect on the resulting retrieval quality in the fusion step of distributed retrieval. These experiments show that good estimates of the actual probability of relevance can be achieved, and the logistic model outperforms the linear one. However, retrieval quality for distributed retrieval (only merging, without resource selection) is only slightly improved by using the logistic function.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.