Abstract
The unsatisfactory quality of the period style work carried out in the past by exceptionally gifted scholars suggests that work on the relationship between the arts suffers from defects of a methodological nature. The weaknesses of the traditional methods are easier to point out than the advantages of any new method, which of necessity has yet to prove itself — but new methods must be tested if progress is to be made. The validity of a structural approach to period style will only be ultimately demonstrated (or discredited) by a full-length study of a period style following this method.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
