From theAMLEEditorial Team:BeinganAMLEReviewer

Abstract

Academy of Management Learning & EducationVol. 18, No. 1 From the EditorsFrom the AMLE Editorial Team: Being an AMLE ReviewerPublished Online:29 Mar 2019https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2019.0021AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleREFERENCESAMLE. 2018. From the AMLE editorial team: Disciplined provocation: Writing essays for AMLE. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 17(4): 397–400. Google ScholarBallinger, G. A., & Johnson, R. E. 2015. Editors’ comments: Your first AMR review. Academy of Management Review, 40(3): 315–322.Link , Google ScholarBrown, K. E. 2012. From the editors: Thoughts on effective reviewing. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(2): 152–154. Google ScholarCarpenter, M. A. 2009. Editor’s comments: Mentoring colleagues in the craft and spirit of peer review. Academy of Management Review, 34(2): 191–195.Link , Google ScholarClair, J. A. 2015. Procedural injustice in the system of peer review and scientific misconduct. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(2): 159–172.Link , Google ScholarCurrie, R. R., & Pandher, G. 2013. Management education journals’ rank and tier by active scholars. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2): 194–218.Link , Google ScholarDobrow, S. R., Chandler, D. E., Murphy, W. M., & Kram, K. E. 2012. A review of developmental networks: Incorporating a mutuality perspective. Journal of Management, 38(1): 210–242. Google ScholarFornaciari, C. J., Arbaugh, J. B., Asarta, C. J., Bento, R. F., Hwang, A., & Lund Dean, K. 2017. Key institutions in business and management education research. Journal of Education for Business, 92(5): 220–229. Google ScholarFoster, W. M. 2018. Our big table approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(1): 1–3.Link , Google ScholarKuhn, T. S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google ScholarLepak, D. 2009. Editor’s comments: What is good reviewing? Academy of Management Review, 34(3): 375–381. Google ScholarLund Dean, K., & Forray, J. M. 2018. On positioning, domains, and readerships: Some thoughts on management education journals. Journal of Management Education, 42(6): 695–703. Google ScholarRagins, B. R. 2015. Editor’s comments: Developing our authors. Academy of Management Review, 40(1): 1–8.Link , Google ScholarRagins, B. R. 2017. Editor’s comments: Raising the bar on developmental reviewing. Academy of Management Review, 42(4): 573–576.Link , Google ScholarRagins, B. R. 2018. From boxing to dancing: Creating a developmental editorial culture. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(2): 158–163. Google ScholarSanders, W. G. 2009. What it means to be a developmental action editor. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4): 640–642.Link , Google ScholarSchminke, M. 2002. From the editors: Tensions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3): 487-490. Google ScholarSims, H. 2016. Response on AOM entrepreneurship listserv. Permission obtained from author. Google ScholarSmith, W. 2016. Developmental reviewer Wendy Smith shares her field guide to reviewing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBIHkqirhCI&feature=youtu.be. Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Vol. 18, No. 1 Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 29 March 2019 Published in print 1 March 2019 Information© Academy of Management Learning & EducationDownload PDF