Abstract
Not long ago, I told the SEG Board that it was highly probable that a majority of our members were interpreters. I got a few blank stares and looks of incredulity. I wondered at that time what they thought all of those 20,000 members were doing (discounting students). What do the demographics of our Society indicate? Do we know? It was certainly true 20 or 30 years ago. Most would not include field data acquisition or data processing under interpretation. I checked the first issue of the new AAPG/SEG journal, Interpretation, and there was no definition. Maybe the editors thought it was self-evident … and maybe it is.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
