Abstract

A study of five diamonds containing mineral and fluid inclusions, selected among forty-nine specimens from the Cullinan Mine, South Africa, was carried out to better document the origin and formation of N-absent B-poor (type IIb) diamonds. The combination of several in-situ non-destructive techniques was used to identify the mineralogy and the chemical composition of primary and secondary inclusions. These include breyite, larnite, graphite, Fe-Ni-Cu native metallic alloys, sulfides of the pyrrhotite group, Ni-rich oxide and potential hydrous ferric sulfates. A common and abundant hydrous fluid containing H2O + CH4 was also identified. From the various observations, we suggest that these type IIb diamonds grew in an aqueous oxidized fluid reacting with a reduced mantle characterized by low oxygen fugacity. Remnant pressures recorded in primary breyite by Raman shifts and XRD measurements enabled the calculation of minimal entrapment pressures of inclusions using elastic geothermobarometry. Applying pressure corrections caused by elastic relaxation, minimum trapping pressures from 4.9 GPa to 5.6 GPa were calculated, suggesting lithospheric depths consistent with the occurrence of numerous graphite inclusions. The association of breyite and larnite, which is often considered as an indicator of sublithospheric origin, also occurs at pressures of 6 GPa or lower in a H2O-rich and carbonate/Ca-rich environment. The B-poor and N-absent features of type IIb diamonds do not require the classic subduction-related model of their formation. Whereas high-pressure minerals would host boron in cold subducting slabs, slabs are also important carriers of nitrogen into the deep mantle, with this latter element mostly absent in these diamonds. In our alternative model, the mantle is proposed as an alternative source of boron, whereby metallic alloys or N speciation between fluid and melt would still prevent the incorporation of nitrogen, leading to the expression of the blue, boron-related and N-absent features of type IIb diamonds. The observed mineralogical assemblage neither proves sublithospheric origin nor does it exclude lithospheric depths of formation for these diamonds. Hence, we propose that type IIb diamonds form in a mantle continuum, from sublithospheric to lithospheric depths.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.